| Autor: |
Cohen L; Department of Medical Psychology, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. L.Cohen.Psychol@med.vu.nl, Pouwer F, Pfennings LE, Lankhorst GJ, van der Ploeg HM, Polman CH, Adèr HJ, Jønnson A, Vleugels L |
| Jazyk: |
angličtina |
| Zdroj: |
Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation [Qual Life Res] 1999; Vol. 8 (1-2), pp. 141-50. |
| DOI: |
10.1023/a:1026481029191 |
| Abstrakt: |
The Disability and Impact Profile (DIP) is used for the measurement of quality of life in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. Data from 211 persons with definite MS from Belgium, Denmark and the Netherlands were used to address three questions. To what extent do the impairment ratings and their complementary weighted scores share common variance? What is the factor structure of the weighted scores? To what extent do disease-related information and information from psychological questionnaires offer concurrent validity for the factors? Correlations between impairment ratings and the weighted item scores were high; for most items the complementary ratings of impact do not supplement information provided by impairment ratings. The DIP weighted scores can be represented to some extent by three independent dimensions: a motor (skeletal movement) or displacement ability factor, a factor relating to sensory-cognitive intactness and a psychological well-being factor. A two-factor solution provides a first factor identical to that of the three-factor solution and a second factor representing psychological well-being. The two factors correlate well with instruments measuring disability and with satisfaction versus emotional distress. Provisional scales based on the factors were constructed. |
| Databáze: |
MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
