ADMITTING EVIDENCE OF AN ACCUSED’S UNCHARGED MISCONDUCT UNDER THE DOCTRINE OF OBJECTIVE CHANCES: BEFORE A JUDGE MAY CONSIDER EVIDENCE OF AN UNCHARGED INCIDENT TO DECIDE WHETHER THERE HAS BEEN A SUSPICIOUS COINCIDENCE, MUST THE ACCUSED CLAIM THAT THE INCIDENT WAS AN ACCIDENT?
Autor: | IMWINKELRIED, EDWARD J.1 |
---|---|
Zdroj: | Denver Law Review. 2021, Vol. 99 Issue 1, p1-35. 35p. 2 Diagrams. |
Databáze: | Academic Search Ultimate |
Externí odkaz: |