Animal and plant‐based proteins have different postprandial effects on energy expenditure, glycemia, insulinemia, and lipemia: A review of controlled clinical trials.

Autor: Dehnavi, Zahra1,2 (AUTHOR), Barghchi, Hanieh1,2 (AUTHOR), Esfehani, Ali Jafarzadeh3 (AUTHOR), Barati, Mehdi4 (AUTHOR), Khorasanchi, Zahra1,2 (AUTHOR), Farsi, Farima2,5 (AUTHOR), Ostad, Andisheh Norouzian1 (AUTHOR), Ranjbar, Golnaz1 (AUTHOR), Rezvani, Reza1 (AUTHOR), Gorgani, Mitra Rezaie1 (AUTHOR), Safarian, Mohammad3 (AUTHOR) safarianm@mums.ac.ir
Předmět:
Zdroj: Food Science & Nutrition. Aug2023, Vol. 11 Issue 8, p4398-4408. 11p.
Abstrakt: Dietary proteins have been shown to stimulate thermogenesis, increase satiety, and improve insulin sensitivity in the short and long term. Animal‐based proteins (AP) and plant‐based proteins (PP) have different amino acid profiles, bioavailability, and digestibility, so it seems to have various short‐ and long‐term effects on metabolic responses. This review aimed to compare the findings of controlled clinical trials on postprandial effects of dietary Aps versus PPs on energy expenditure (EE), lipemia, glycemia, and insulinemia. Data are inconclusive regarding the postprandial effects of APs and PPs. However, there is some evidence indicating that APs increase postprandial EE, DIT, and SO more than PPs. With lipemia and glycemia, most studies showed that APs reduce or delay postprandial glycemia and lipemia and increase insulinemia more than PPs. The difference in amino acid composition, digestion and absorption rate, and gastric emptying rate between APs and PPs explains this difference. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Databáze: GreenFILE
Externí odkaz:
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje