| Abstrakt: |
Natural gas is the cleanest form of fossil fuel that needs to be purified from CO 2 and H 2 S to diminish harmful emissions and provide feasible processing. The conventional chemical and physical solvents used for this purpose have many drawbacks, including corrosion, solvent loss, high energy requirement, and the formation of toxic compounds, which ultimately disrupt the process and affect the environment. Hybrid solvents have lately been researched to cater to these liabilities and enhance process economics. This study screened eight solvents based on CO 2 selectivity viscosity, absorption enthalpy, corrosivity, working capacity, specific heat, and vapor pressure. From the screened solvents, ten cases of hybrid solvents are simulated and optimized on Aspen HYSYS®. Furthermore, 5Es (Energy, Exergy, Economic, Environmental, and Exergy-environmental) analyses were performed on optimized cases, and results were compared with the base case, MEA (30 wt%). The hybrid blend of Sulfolane and MDEA with weight percentages of 6% and 24%, respectively, showed the highest energy savings of 20% concerning the base case. In addition, it offered 93% savings in exergy destruction and 17.26% in the total operating cost of the process. It is also promising to the environment due to reduced entropy sent to the ecosystem and controlled CO 2 emissions. Therefore, the blend of Sulfolane and MDEA is proposed to Supersede the conventional solvent MEA for the natural gas sweetening process. [Display omitted] • A thorough study on absorption process using hybrid solvents to find a better replacement of conventional MEA process. • Blend of MDEA and Sulfolane had the least energy consumption of about 23 MW. • It also showed the least exergy destruction of 2.5 × 104 kW. • MDEA and Sulfolane blend also showed a satisfactory performance in Environmental analysis with CO 2 emissions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
Full Text from ScienceDirect