| Autor: |
Purucker, S. Thomas1 (AUTHOR) purucker.tom@epa.gov, Snyder, Marcía N.2 (AUTHOR), Glinski, Donna A.3 (AUTHOR), Van Meter, Robin J.4 (AUTHOR), Garber, Kristina5 (AUTHOR), Chelsvig, Emma A.6 (AUTHOR), Cyterski, Michael J.7 (AUTHOR), Sinnathamby, Sumathy5 (AUTHOR), Paulukonis, Elizabeth A.6 (AUTHOR), Henderson, W. Matthew7 (AUTHOR) |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Integrated Environmental Assessment & Management. Jan2023, Vol. 19 Issue 1, p9-16. 8p. |
| Abstrakt: |
Chemical exposure estimation through the dermal route is an underemphasized area of ecological risk assessment for terrestrial animals. Currently, there are efforts to create exposure models to estimate doses from this pathway for use in ecological risk assessment. One significant limitation has been insufficient published data to characterize exposure and to support the selection and parameterization of appropriate models, particularly for amphibians in terrestrial habitats. Recent publications measuring pesticide doses to terrestrial‐phase amphibians have begun to rectify this situation. We collated and summarized available measurements of terrestrial amphibian dermal exposure to pesticides from 11 studies in which researchers measured tissue concentrations associated with known pesticide experimental application rates. This data set included tissue concentrations in 11 amphibian species and 14 different pesticides. We then compared the results of two screening exposure models that differed based on surface area scaling approaches as a function of body weight (one based on birds as surrogates for amphibians and another amphibian‐specific) to the measured tissue residue concentrations. We define a false‐negative rate for each screening model as the proportion of amphibians for which the predicted concentration is less than the observed concentration (i.e., underestimate), contrary to the intent of screening models, which are intended to have a bias for higher exposure concentrations. The screening model that uses birds as surrogates did not have any instances where estimated expected avian doses were less than measured amphibian body burdens. When using the amphibian‐specific exposure model that corrected for differences between avian and amphibian surface area, measured concentrations were greater than model estimates for 11.3% of the 1158 comparisons. The database of measured pesticide concentrations in terrestrial amphibians is provided for use in calculating bioconcentration factors and for future amphibian dermal exposure model development. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2023;19:9–16. © 2022 SETAC. This article has been contributed to by U.S. Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA. KEY POINTS: The dermal exposure route is an underemphasized area of ecological risk assessment for amphibians but has been limited, until recently, by few studies that quantify postexposure tissue residues.We collate and summarize available measurements from terrestrial amphibian dermal exposure studies (11 publications, 11 pesticides, 14 species) with measured tissue concentrations associated with known pesticide experimental application rates.We compare current and proposed ecological screening approaches to test how often amphibian exposure algorithms underestimate experimentally derived measurements.We make this collated data set available for further terrestrial amphibian dermal model development, calibration, and verification. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Databáze: |
GreenFILE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Plný text