| Autor: |
Redman, Aaron D.1 (AUTHOR) aaron.d.redman@exxonmobil.com, Bietz, Jens2 (AUTHOR), Davis, John W.3,4 (AUTHOR), Lyon, Delina5 (AUTHOR), Maloney, Erin5 (AUTHOR), Ott, Amelie6,7 (AUTHOR), Otte, Jens C.8 (AUTHOR), Palais, Frédéric9 (AUTHOR), Parsons, John R.10 (AUTHOR), Wang, Neil11 (AUTHOR) |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Integrated Environmental Assessment & Management. Jun2022, Vol. 18 Issue 4, p868-887. 20p. |
| Abstrakt: |
Assessing the persistence of chemicals in the environment is a key element in existing regulatory frameworks to protect human health and ecosystems. Persistence in the environment depends on many fate processes, including abiotic and biotic transformations and physical partitioning, which depend on substances' physicochemical properties and environmental conditions. A main challenge in persistence assessment is that existing frameworks rely on simplistic and reductionist evaluation schemes that may lead substances to be falsely assessed as persistent or the other way around—to be falsely assessed as nonpersistent. Those evaluation schemes typically assess persistence against degradation half‐lives determined in single‐compartment simulation tests or against degradation levels measured in stringent screening tests. Most of the available test methods, however, do not apply to all types of substances, especially substances that are poorly soluble, complex in composition, highly sorptive, or volatile. In addition, the currently applied half‐life criteria are derived mainly from a few legacy persistent organic pollutants, which do not represent the large diversity of substances entering the environment. Persistence assessment would undoubtedly benefit from the development of more flexible and holistic evaluation schemes including new concepts and methods. A weight‐of‐evidence (WoE) approach incorporating multiple influencing factors is needed to account for chemical fate and transformation in the whole environment so as to assess overall persistence. The present paper's aim is to begin to develop an integrated assessment framework that combines multimedia approaches to organize and interpret data using a clear WoE approach to allow for a more consistent, transparent, and thorough assessment of persistence. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2022;18:868–887. © 2021 ExxonMobil Biomedical Sciences, Inc. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC). Key Points: Weight of Evidence (WoE) is needed to utilize different standard and non‐standard data types.A WoE framework is presented to organize the comparisons and make use of all available data.Overall persistence (Pov) supports holistic assessments that account for emission patterns and physicochemical properties of a substance.Combined WoE and Pov frameworks will support improved persistence assessments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Databáze: |
GreenFILE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Plný text