| Popis: |
Abstract The rheometric techniques available for the evaluation of mortars involve a different set of flow conditions. Squeeze flow is based on the compression of the sample with gap reduction and geometric restrictions, providing important information even when phase separation occurs and an evaluation in conditions similar to those found in several practical situations for many classes of materials, including cement‐based and ceramics. Traditional squeeze flow results are related to bulk normal force and height variation of a sample compressed between parallel plates. Additional information regarding boundary conditions at the interfaces or phenomena related to differential flow can be obtained through further instrumentation of the test. The combination of squeeze flow and a pressure mapping technique has been recently proposed, with great potential for the analysis of cement‐based materials and other granular suspensions. In this work, four mortars were evaluated by the pressure mapped squeeze flow (PMSF) method in two different displacement rates, and new ways to analyze the results were developed to expand the understanding of the flow through the technique, including plotting the pressure along multiple circumferences and an analysis of variation in each radial position. PMSF results were also compared to rotational rheometry and flow table tests for the first time, and concepts of interparticle separation were employed to discuss microstructural aspects of the flow. Due to the variety of mix designs (admixtures, particle size distribution, air content, water content, and other factors), the mortars presented diverse behaviors, ranging from primarily viscous or plastic flows to more granular responses (related to friction between particles with localized formation of jammed structures due to liquid phase migration). This work is part of an effort to establish a foundation for PMSF as a rheometric method that can be used for the analysis of a wide range of materials. |
Plný text