| Popis: |
Abstract Key message Removal of logging residue negatively affected tree diameter and height, but had no significant effect on the basal area of the subsequent stand (in the mid-term). On the other hand, different methods of mechanical site preparation (bedding, plowing furrows, and trenching) had no effect on tree growth 1 year after planting, but had a significant effect on tree diameter, tree height, and basal area in the mid-term. Bedding treatments could have a significant positive impact on the productivity of the subsequent Scots pine stands, even when planted on sandy, free-draining soils. Context Increased use of logging residues in forests may address the growing demand for renewable energy. However, concerns have arisen regarding the depletion of the forest soil, resulting in a decrease in the productivity of the next forest generation. Identifying the drivers of forest growth may be the key to understanding the relationship between logging residue removal and stand productivity. Aims Quantifying the effect of three mechanical site preparation methods (bedding, plowing furrows, and trenching) combined with five methods of logging residue management (complete removal, comminution, incineration, leaving whole, comminution with, and without mixing with topsoil) on growth of subsequent Scots pine stands, 1 year and 12 years after planting. Methods The experiment was set up as a randomized complete block design of 45 plots with three replications of combinations of three mechanical site preparation methods and five logging residue treatment methods. Results The effects of the different methods of mechanical site preparation were not significant 1 year after planting but bedding treatment caused increase in DBH, tree height, and basal area after 12 years. Various methods of logging residue management did not cause any differences in the survival rate nor the basal area of the next-generation stands; however, there was a significant influence on tree sizes. Moreover, the effects changed with time; in plots with a complete removal of logging residues, the trees were the highest 1 year after planting, but after 12 years, their height and DBH were the lowest. Conclusions It can be concluded that bedding treatments could have a significant positive impact on the productivity of the subsequent Scots pine stands. No effect found of different logging residue treatments on the productivity of Scots pine stands further confirms that the increased removal of biomass from the forest environment does not necessarily result in its rapid degradation. Observations at longer term are however needed to obtain the full spectrum of responses to logging residue removal. |
Full text from SpringerLink