| Autor: |
Ardhanariswari Riris, Fauzan Muhammad, Komari Ahmad |
| Jazyk: |
English<br />French |
| Rok vydání: |
2018 |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
SHS Web of Conferences, Vol 54, p 02006 (2018) |
| Druh dokumentu: |
article |
| ISSN: |
2261-2424 |
| DOI: |
10.1051/shsconf/20185402006 |
| Popis: |
The Constitutional Court is one of the perpetrators of judicial power, in addition to the Supreme Court as referred to in Article 24 paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution. The Constitutional Court is also bound to the general principle of an independent judicial power, free from the influence of other institutions in enforcing law and justice. The Constitutional Court is the first and last level judicial body, or it can be said that it is the only judicial body whose decisions are final and binding. The existence of the Constitutional Court is at the same time to maintain the implementation of a stable state government and is also a correction to the experience of constitutional life in the past caused by multiple interpretations of the constitution. Judicial review towards the constitution is one of the authorities of the Constitutional Court that attracted attention. This shows that there has also been a shift in the doctrine of the parliamentary supremacy towards the doctrine of the supremacy of the constitution. The law was previously inviolable, but now the existence of a law is questionable in its alignment with the Constitution. The authority to examine the Law towards the Constitution is the authority of the Constitutional Court as the guardian of the constitution. This authority is carried out to safeguard the provisions of the Act so that it does not conflict with the constitution and / or impair the constitutional rights of citizens. This shows that the judicial review towards the Constitution carried out by the Constitutional Court is basically also to provide protection for human rights. |
| Databáze: |
Directory of Open Access Journals |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
