Papanicolaou test collection with the Papette brush or the spatula with cytobrush: A pragmatic study
| Autor: | Danielle J O’Laughlin, Brittany A Strelow, Nicole A Fellows, Joy N Stevens, Elizabeth A Kelsey, Stephanie R Fink, Sonya M Peters, Jennifer A Johnson, Jaclyn P Houghton, Anne M Stolp, Karen M Fischer, Johanna M Tweedy, Ramona S DeJesus |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2023 |
| Předmět: | |
| Zdroj: | Women's Health, Vol 19 (2023) |
| Druh dokumentu: | article |
| ISSN: | 1745-5065 17455057 |
| DOI: | 10.1177/17455057231170975 |
| Popis: | Background: Cotesting with the Papanicolaou (Pap) and human papillomavirus tests detects most precancerous and cancerous lesions and increases the sensitivity for detecting high-grade precancerous and invasive cervical cancers compared with human papillomavirus testing alone. Objective: To compare the use of the Papette brush (hereafter Papette) to the traditional spatula with endocervical brush (cytobrush) for cervical cancer screening. Design: Pragmatic observational study. Methods: Adult women aged 21–64 years who were eligible for a Papanicolaou test at a Midwest Community Internal Medicine practice underwent cervical cancer screening using the Papette or spatula with cytobrush from 18 August 2021 through 1 February 2022. Cluster sampling was used across the practice. Pathology reports were then analyzed to compare the number of satisfactory versus unsatisfactory results between the two collection techniques. Results: We collected results for 756 Pap tests. The test results were satisfactory with the Papette 93.8% of the time compared with 93.0% for the spatula with cytobrush. Conclusion: The Papette is not inferior to a spatula with cytobrush as a collection method for Pap tests. |
| Databáze: | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| Externí odkaz: |
|