| Autor: |
Lady Paola Aristizabal Arboleda, Aline Borburema Neves, Hugo Fontan Kohler, José Guilherme Vartanian, Letícia Miliano Candelária, Matheus Ferraz Borges, Gisele Aparecida Fernandes, Genival Barbosa deCarvalho, Luiz Paulo Kowalski, Paul Brennan, Alan Roger Santos‐Silva, Maria Paula Curado |
| Jazyk: |
angličtina |
| Rok vydání: |
2023 |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Cancer Reports, Vol 6, Iss 8, Pp n/a-n/a (2023) |
| Druh dokumentu: |
article |
| ISSN: |
2573-8348 |
| DOI: |
10.1002/cnr2.1837 |
| Popis: |
Abstract Background The treatment of glottic cancer remains challenging, especially with regard to morbidity reduction and larynx preservation rates. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) has published guidelines to aid decision‐making about this treatment according to the tumor site, clinical stage, and patient medical status. Aim The present review was conducted to identify changes in the NCCN guidelines for glottic cancer treatment made between 2011 and 2022 and to describe the published evidence concerning glottic cancer treatment and oncological outcomes in the same time period. Methods and Results Clinical practice guidelines for head and neck cancer published from 2011 up to 2022 were obtained from the NCCN website (www.NCCN.org). Data on glottic cancer treatment recommendations were extracted, and descriptive analysis was performed. In addition, a review of literature registered in the PubMed database was performed to obtain data on glottic cancer management protocols and treatment outcomes from randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, and meta‐analyses published from 2011 to 2022. In total, 24 NCCN guidelines and updates and 68 relevant studies included in the PubMed database were identified. The main guideline changes made pertained to surgical and systemic therapies, the consideration of adverse features, and new options for the treatment of metastatic disease at initial presentation. Early‐stage glottic cancer received the most research attention, with transoral endoscopic laser surgery and radiotherapy assessed and compared as the main treatment modalities. Reported associations between treatment types and survival rates for this stage of glottic cancer appear to be similar, but functional outcomes can be highly compromised. Conclusion NCCN panel members provide updated recommendations based on currently accepted treatment approaches for glottic cancer, constantly reviewing new surgical and non‐surgical techniques. The guidelines support decision‐making about glottic cancer treatment that should be individualized and prioritize patients' quality of life, functionality, and preferences. |
| Databáze: |
Directory of Open Access Journals |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Plný text