| Autor: |
Ali Sabbagh, Jessica Weiss, Bouchra Tawk, Mohammed A. Mohammed, Hasan Abdulbaki, Fabio Y. Moraes, Surbhi Grover, Mei Ling Yap, Eduardo Zubizarreta, Yolande Lievens, Danielle Rodin, Osama Mohamad |
| Jazyk: |
angličtina |
| Rok vydání: |
2023 |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
JCO Global Oncology, Vol , Iss 9 (2023) |
| Druh dokumentu: |
article |
| ISSN: |
2687-8941 |
| DOI: |
10.1200/GO.23.00046 |
| Popis: |
PURPOSEHypofractionation is noninferior to conventional fractionation in the treatment of localized prostate cancer. Using results from the European Society of Radiation Oncology's (ESTRO) Global Impact of Radiotherapy in Oncology (GIRO) initiative survey on hypofractionation, this study identifies rates of adoption, facilitating factors, and barriers to adoption of hypofractionation in prostate cancer across World Bank income groups.MATERIALS AND METHODSThe ESTRO-GIRO initiative administered an international, anonymous, electronic survey to radiation oncologists from 2018 to 2019. Physician demographics, clinical practice characteristics, and hypofractionation regimen use (if any) for several prostate cancer scenarios were collected. Responders were asked about specific justifications and barriers to adopting hypofractionation, and responses were stratified by World Bank income group. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to analyze variables associated with hypofractionation preference.RESULTSA total of 1,157 physician responses were included. Most respondents (60%) were from high-income countries (HICs). In the curative setting, hypofractionation was most often preferred in low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancers, with 52% and 47% of respondents reporting hypofractionation use in ≥50% of patients, respectively. These rates drop to 35% and 20% in high-risk prostate cancer and where pelvic irradiation is indicated. Most respondents (89%) preferred hypofractionation in the palliative setting. Overall, respondents from upper-middle-income countries and lower-middle- and low-income countries were significantly less likely to prefer hypofractionation than those from HICs (P < .001). The most frequently cited justification and barrier were availability of published evidence and fear of worse late toxicity, respectively.CONCLUSIONHypofractionation preference varies by indication and World Bank income group, with greater acceptance among providers in HICs for all indications. These results provide a basis for targeted interventions to increase provider acceptance of this treatment modality. |
| Databáze: |
Directory of Open Access Journals |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
