| Autor: |
Müller-Stich Beat P, Seiler Christoph M, Hinz Ulf, Scheel Verena, Knebel Phillip, Gehrig Tobias, Büchler Markus W, Gutt Carsten N |
| Jazyk: |
angličtina |
| Rok vydání: |
2011 |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Trials, Vol 12, Iss 1, p 162 (2011) |
| Druh dokumentu: |
article |
| ISSN: |
1745-6215 |
| DOI: |
10.1186/1745-6215-12-162 |
| Popis: |
Abstract Background The pp-Whipple procedure requires extensive preparation. The conventional preparation technique is done with scissors for dissection and ligatures, and with clips and sutures for hemostasis. This procedure is very time-consuming and requires numerous changes of instruments. The LigaSure™ device allows dissection and hemostasis for preparation with one instrument. Up to now there has been no comparison of the two techniques with regard to operating time and the patients' outcome. It is still unclear which technique has the optimal benefit/risk ratio for the patient. Methods/Design A single-center, randomized, single-blinded, controlled superiority trial to compare two different techniques for dissection in a pp-Whipple procedure. 102 patients will be included and randomized pre-operatively. All patients aged 18 years or older scheduled for primary elective pp-Whipple procedure who signed the informed consent will be included. The primary endpoint is the operating time of the randomized technique. Control Intervention: Conventional dissection technique; experimental intervention: LigaSureTM dissection technique. Duration of study: Approximately 15 months; follow up time: 3 years. The trial is registered at German ClinicalTrials Register (DRKS00000166). |
| Databáze: |
Directory of Open Access Journals |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
