Alternate day versus consecutive day oral iron supplementation in iron-depleted women: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled studyResearch in context

Autor: Hanna K. von Siebenthal, Sara Gessler, Florence Vallelian, Joachim Steinwendner, Urs-Martin Kuenzi, Diego Moretti, Michael B. Zimmermann, Nicole U. Stoffel
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2023
Předmět:
Zdroj: EClinicalMedicine, Vol 65, Iss , Pp 102286- (2023)
Druh dokumentu: article
ISSN: 2589-5370
DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102286
Popis: Summary: Background: Guidelines to treat iron deficiency recommend daily provision of oral iron, but this may decrease fractional iron absorption and increase side effects. Our objective was to compare consecutive-day versus alternate-day iron supplementation. Methods: In a double-masked, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, young Swiss women (n = 150; serum ferritin ≤30 μg/L) were assigned to: daily 100 mg iron for 90 d, followed by daily placebo for another 90 d (consecutive-day group) or the same daily dose of iron and placebo on alternate days for 180 d (alternate-day group). The study period was 24/11/2021–10/8/2022. Co-primary outcomes, at equal total iron doses, were serum ferritin and gastrointestinal side effects; secondary outcomes were iron deficiency and serum hepcidin. Compliance and side effects were recorded daily using a mobile application. Data were analysed using mixed models and longitudinal prevalence ratios (LPR). The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05105438). Findings: 75 women were assigned to each group and included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Capsule adherence and side effect reporting was >97% in both groups. At equal total iron doses, comparing consecutive-day and alternate-day groups, median serum ferritin was 43.8 μg/L (31.7–58.2) versus 44.8 μg/L (33.8–53.6) (P = 0.98), the LPR for gastrointestinal side effects on days of iron intake was 1.56 (95% CI: 1.38, 1.77; P
Databáze: Directory of Open Access Journals