| Popis: |
Anders Aasted Isaksen,1,2 Annelli Sandbæk,1,2 Lasse Bjerg1,2 1Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; 2Steno Diabetes Center Aarhus, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, DenmarkCorrespondence: Anders Aasted Isaksen, Institut for Folkesundhed, Aarhus Universitet, Bartholins Allé 2, Aarhus, 8000, Denmark, Email aai@ph.au.dkPurpose: To validate two register-based algorithms classifying type 1 (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) in a general population using Danish register data.Patients and Methods: After linking data on prescription drug usage, hospital diagnoses, laboratory results and diabetes-specific healthcare services from nationwide healthcare registers, diabetes type was defined for all individuals in Central Denmark Region age 18– 74 years on 31 December 2018 according to two distinct register-based classifiers: 1) a novel register-based diabetes classifier incorporating diagnostic hemoglobin-A1C measurements, the Open-Source Diabetes Classifier (OSDC), and 2) an existing Danish diabetes classifier, the Register for Selected Chronic Diseases (RSCD). These classifications were validated against self-reported data from the Health in Central Denmark survey – overall and stratified by age at onset of diabetes. The source-code of both classifiers was made available in the open-source R package osdc.Results: A total of 2633 (9.0%) of 29,391 respondents reported having any type of diabetes, divided across 410 (1.4%) self-reported cases of T1D and 2223 (7.6%) cases of T2D. Among all self-reported diabetes cases, 2421 (91.9%) were classified as diabetes cases by both classifiers. In T1D, sensitivity of OSDC-classification was 0.773 [95% CI 0.730– 0.813] (RSCD: 0.700 [0.653– 0.744]) and positive predictive value (PPV) 0.943 [0.913– 0.966] (RSCD: 0.944 [0.912– 0.967]). In T2D, sensitivity of OSDC-classification was 0.944 [0.933– 0.953] (RSCD: 0.905 [0.892– 0.917]) and PPV 0.875 [0.861– 0.888] (RSCD: 0.898 [0.884– 0.910]). In age at onset-stratified analyses of both classifiers, sensitivity and PPV were low in individuals with T1D onset after age 40 and T2D onset before age 40.Conclusion: Both register-based classifiers identified valid populations of T1D and T2D in a general population, but sensitivity was substantially higher in OSDC compared to RSCD. Register-classified diabetes type in cases with atypical age at onset of diabetes should be interpreted with caution. The validated, open-source classifiers provide robust and transparent tools for researchers.Keywords: type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes, classification, population-based, open-source |
