US Flood risk management in changing times
| Autor: | Gregory B. Baecher, Gerald E. Galloway |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: | |
| Zdroj: | Water Policy, Vol 23, Iss S1, Pp 202-215 (2021) |
| Druh dokumentu: | article |
| ISSN: | 1366-7017 1996-9759 |
| DOI: | 10.2166/wp.2021.269 |
| Popis: | The traditional regulatory and policy approach to flood risk in the US has been the optimization of benefits and costs, broadly mandated by federal policy. However, optimization may not be the best approach to flood risk management in light of the deep uncertainties we now face. A more incremental approach using a satisficing strategy may be. Flood risk is a function of the hydrologic factors that produce a hazard and the consequences of the hazard interfacing with the people and property exposed. Regretfully, both hydrologists and climatologists seem unable to provide the clairvoyant guidance needed by the water community facing major decisions on flood risk management in the coming years. As the seminal ‘Red Book’ noted, two things have become second nature to policy analysts and risk managers: absolute safety is unachievable, and it is necessary to distinguish between science and policy. The forcing elements and largest unknowns in determining risk rest with understanding the hydrologic factors involved in shaping the hazard. HIGHLIGHTS Flood risk is a function of hazard, exposure, and vulnerability.; Hydrologists and climatologists seem unable to provide guidance for coming years.; The US operates with an inconsistent approach to dealing with hydrologic factors.; Quantitative risk analysis may not be the best approach considering the deep uncertainties such analyses face.; A more incremental and satisficing one may be.; |
| Databáze: | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| Externí odkaz: |
|