Individualized feedback on colonoscopy skills improves group colonoscopy quality in providers with lower adenoma detection rates

Autor: Rajesh N. Keswani, Mariah Wood, Mark Benson, Andrew J. Gawron, Charles Kahi, Tonya Kaltenbach, Rena Yadlapati, Dyanna Gregory, Anna Duloy
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2022
Předmět:
Zdroj: Endoscopy International Open, Vol 10, Iss 03, Pp E232-E237 (2022)
Druh dokumentu: article
ISSN: 2364-3722
2196-9736
DOI: 10.1055/a-1529-5574
Popis: Background and study aims Colonoscopy inspection quality (CIQ) assesses skills (fold examination, cleaning, and luminal distension) during inspection for polyps and correlates with adenoma detection rate (ADR) and serrated detection rate (SDR). We aimed to determine whether providing individualized CIQ feedback with instructional videos improves quality metrics performance. Methods We prospectively studied 16 colonoscopists who already received semiannual benchmarked reports of quality metrics (ADR, SDR, and withdrawal time [WT]). We randomly selected seven colonoscopies/colonoscopist for evaluation. Six gastroenterologists graded CIQ using an established scale. We created instructional videos demonstrating optimal and poor inspection techniques. Colonoscopists received the instructional videos and benchmarked CIQ performance. We compared ADR, SDR, and WT in the 12 months preceding (“baseline”) and following CIQ feedback. Colonoscopists were stratified by baseline ADR into lower (≤ 34 %) and higher-performing (> 34 %) groups. Results Baseline ADR was 38.5 % (range 26.8 %–53.8 %) and SDR was 11.2 % (2.8 %–24.3 %). The proportion of colonoscopies performed by lower-performing colonoscopists was unchanged from baseline to post-CIQ feedback. All colonoscopists reviewed their CIQ report cards. Post-feedback, ADR (40.1 % vs 38.5 %, P = 0.1) and SDR (12.2 % vs. 11.2 %, P = 0.1) did not significantly improve; WT significantly increased (11.4 vs 12.4 min, P
Databáze: Directory of Open Access Journals
Externí odkaz: