| Popis: |
Jun Han,1 Shuai Wang,2 Mei Ding1 1Department of Obstetrics, Guangzhou Hospital of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine, Guangzhou, 510800, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Critical Care Medicine, Guangzhou Hospital of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine, Guangzhou, 510800, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Jun Han, Department of Obstetrics, Guangzhou Hospital of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine, No. 87, Yingbin Avenue, Huadu District, Guangzhou, 510800, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86 020-86888565, Email hanjun6382@126.comObjective: We explored the feasibility and safety of external cephalic version (ECV) for cases of breech presentation.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from 158 singleton pregnant women with breech presentation at 36 weeks gestation, admitted to Guangzhou Hospital of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine from January 2018 to March 2022. 42 underwent ECV, categorized as the ECV group, while 116 without ECV comprised the control group. Systematic collection and evaluation of pregnancy outcomes were conducted for both groups.Results: Within the control group, 16 cases experienced a spontaneous transition to head presentation, among which 14 cases resulted in successful vaginal deliveries. In 2 cases, cesarean deliveries were performed due to fetal macrosomia and persistent posterior occipital presentation. Furthermore, 2 cases of breech presentation in pregnant women were successfully delivered vaginally through breech traction, necessitating an emergency procedure due to the wide opening of the uterus. Within the ECV group, 28 cases were successfully inverted to the cephalic presentation. Among them, 1 case underwent an emergency cesarean delivery due to fetal distress during cephalic delivery, 3 cases required cesarean deliveries due to abnormal labor, and 24 cases were successfully delivered vaginally. The comparative analyses showed that the cesarean section rate (18/42 vs 100/116) and non-cephalic delivery rate (14/42 vs 100/116) in the ECV group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P < 0.001). There was no statistically significant differences between the two groups with respect to the rate of newborns with Apgar score < 7 (1/42 vs 3/116), premature rupture of membrane (3/42 vs 20/116), acute fetal distress (2/42 vs 2/116), and cord prolapse (0/42 vs 1/116) (P > 0.05).Conclusion: ECV can effectively reduce the rate of cesarean delivery and non-cephalic deliveries. However, it but requires strict adherence to indications and continuous monitoring.Keywords: abnormal fetal presentation, cesarean section rate, ECV, pregnancy complications |
