Contrastive Explanations for Argumentation-Based Conclusions
| Autor: | Borg, AnneMarie, Bex, Floris |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: | |
| Druh dokumentu: | Working Paper |
| Popis: | In this paper we discuss contrastive explanations for formal argumentation - the question why a certain argument (the fact) can be accepted, whilst another argument (the foil) cannot be accepted under various extension-based semantics. The recent work on explanations for argumentation-based conclusions has mostly focused on providing minimal explanations for the (non-)acceptance of arguments. What is still lacking, however, is a proper argumentation-based interpretation of contrastive explanations. We show under which conditions contrastive explanations in abstract and structured argumentation are meaningful, and how argumentation allows us to make implicit foils explicit. Comment: Forthcoming as an extended abstract in the Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2022) |
| Databáze: | arXiv |
| Externí odkaz: |
|