| Popis: |
To compare variability, reproducibility and repeatability of four quantitative evaluation methods to interpret theThis was a descriptive observational study carried out with SPECT images of 38 patients with clinical and radiographic signs of unilateral condylar hyperplasia, and interpreted using four quantitative methods: 1) one image, variable-size region of interest (ROI); 2) one image, fixed-size ROI (1.76cmHigher reproducibility and repeatability were obtained in 5-image fixed-size ROI method (intra-class correlation coefficient: 0.979 [0.959; 0.989]). A high grade of diagnostic agreement (97.4%) was also attained in fixed methods (Kappa 0.940, p value: .000) from either total or normalized counts. There was no difference between fixed-size 1 vs 5 image methods. The methods based on variable-size ROI had a low grade of agreement (Kappa0.20). More positive cases were identified using one image, ROI variable total counts (27 cases), but when the counts were normalized, they presented a lower number (5 cases).Five-image fixed-size ROI provides the best intra-operator and inter-operator reliability for the diagnosis of unilateral condylar hyperplasia. In the four methods using normalized counts fewer positive cases were detected (≥10%), unlike with total counts when more positive cases were found. |
Full Text from ScienceDirect