| Popis: |
Surgical debridement is critical to the treatment of open tibia fractures, although the effects of delayed debridement have not been well-established. Other factors such as Gustilo-Anderson type, prompt initiation of antibiotics, and time to definitive closure may be more predictive of infection than time to surgery. We sought to determine the effect of a prolonged delay to surgical debridement with respect to infection and reoperation rates for open tibia fractures.All open diaphyseal tibia fractures with 12-week follow-up were evaluated. Patient demographics, Gustilo-Anderson type, and rates of deep infection and all-cause reoperation were recorded. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on time to surgery: early ( 24 h), delayed (24-48 h), and late ( 48 h). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the relationship between time to surgery, fracture type, infection, and reoperation.In total, 96 open tibia fractures with average follow-up of 59.3 weeks and infection rate of 13.5% were included. Infection rates for the early, delayed, and late groups were 13.3%, 17.2%, and 9.1%, respectively (p = 0.70). Reoperation rates for the early, delayed, and late groups were 29.8%, 31.0%, and 22.7%, respectively (p = 0.80). The groups did not vary in proportion of Gustilo-Anderson fracture types; infection rates between Gustilo-Anderson types were similar (p = 0.57). Type IIIA-C fractures required more reoperations than other fracture types (p = 0.01).Delayed surgical debridement of open tibia fractures did not result in greater rates of infection or reoperation. Gustilo-Anderson classification was more predictive of reoperation, with Type IIIA-C injuries having a significantly higher reoperation rate. |
Full text from SpringerLink