A 10-year follow-up of different intra-radicular retainers in teeth restored with zirconia crowns

Autor: Calabro, Debora E., Kojima, Alberto N. [UNESP], Pecorari, Vanessa Gallego Arias, Saraceni, Cintia Helena Coury, Blatz, Markus B., Özcan, Mutlu, Mesquita, Alfredo Mikail Melo
Přispěvatelé: Paulista University (UNIP) São Paulo, Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp), Paulista University (UNIP), University of Zurich, University of Pennsylvania
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2019
Předmět:
Zdroj: Scopus
Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
Popis: Made available in DSpace on 2020-12-12T01:11:00Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2019-01-01 Purpose: To evaluate the survival rate in restored teeth with three different types of retainers prior to the fixing of crowns with zirconia through this retrospective clinical study. It is unclear how the type of post and core rehabilitation, and type of resin cement affect the longevity of teethrestored with crowns. Methods: In a private clinic, a total of 101 retainers installed by the same professional between June 2008 and January 2018, with an average time of 58.2 months (4.8 years), were analyzed regarding the following factors: survival, cement and failure type. Three types of retainers were used according to the indications found in the literature: filling with Z250 light-cured composite resin, 22 elements; fiberglass post with Z250 light-cured composite resin, 45 elements; and cast metallic core in silver-tin alloy, 34 elements. The retainers were cemented with chemically cured cement, U100, U200, or Panavia F. Results: Data were subjected to Kaplan-Meier analysis (p=0.495). Although the study presented several limitations, no significant differences were observed in the success rates between the types of intra-radicular retainers and the type of cement. The success rates were as follows: metal core, 97.1%; fiberglass post, 95.6%; and filling, 100%. On average, failures occurred at 48.4 months. Conclusion: In view of the results, it is possible to conclude that the different retainers evaluated have similar survival rates. Department of Prosthodontics Paulista University (UNIP) São Paulo Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Paulista State University (UNESP) São José Department of Dental Materials Paulista University (UNIP) Unit Center for Dental and Oral Medicine Clinic for Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Material Science University of Zurich Department of Preventive and Restorative Sciencie University of Pennsylvania Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Paulista State University (UNESP) São José
Databáze: OpenAIRE