'NO PRAETOR ABOVE STATES'. A CONTRIBUTION TO HEGEL'S CRITIQUE OF KANT'S CONCEPT OF PERPETUAL PEACE
| Autor: | Hans Christian Lucas |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | chorvatština |
| Rok vydání: | 1996 |
| Zdroj: | Politička misao : časopis za politologiju Volume 33 Issue 4 |
| ISSN: | 1846-8721 0032-3241 |
| Popis: | Prema autoru razlika između Hegela i Kanta u pogledu obrade ideje vječnog mira pokazuje se kao indikator radikalno različitih koncepata filozofije. Prva se filozofija u trezvenom prihvaćanju onoga što jest trudi da postulatima objasni gdje su potrebna poboljšanja. Druga filozofija govori o pomirenju uma i zbilje i stoga je se često procjenjuje malodušnom. Pa ipak diferencija Hegela i Kanta koja u pojedinim tezama djeluje nepremostivo, izgleda prema autorovim pretpostavkama manje načelna nego što se obično sluti, jer Kantovi moralno filozofski zahtjevi prema politici imaju očigledno samo onda pravi smisao ako se pretpostavi da postoji povjerenje u djelotvornost uma u povijesti. According to the author, the difference between Hegel and Kant regarding the definition of the idea of perpetual peace is indicative of their radically different concepts of philosophy. The first philosophy strives, through the sober acceptance of what really is, to point out where improvements are needed. The second talks about the reconciliation of reason and reality and is consequently frequently dubbed despondent. Nevertheless, and according to the author, this difference between Hegel and Kant (which in certain postulates looks incompatible) is less principle-based than is usually thought, since Kant's moral and philosophical requirements regarding politics are meaningful only if there is the underlying confidence as to the historical efficacy of the reason. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|