Providers' Perceptions of Spinal Cord Injury Pressure Ulcer Guidelines
| Autor: | Susan S. Thomason, Jeffrey J Harrow, D. Helen Moore, Maria A Mullins, Celinda P Evitt, Gail Powell-Cope, Linda Love, Audrey L. Nelson |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2007 |
| Předmět: |
Male
medicine.medical_specialty Attitude of Health Personnel Nurses Convenience sample Education Nursing care Physicians medicine Humans Spinal cord injury Spinal Cord Injuries Pressure Ulcer Evidence-Based Medicine business.industry Original Contribution Evidence-based medicine Focus Groups Middle Aged Skin ulcer medicine.disease Focus group United States Clinical Practice Health Care Surveys Practice Guidelines as Topic Physical therapy Female Nursing Care Guideline Adherence Neurology (clinical) medicine.symptom business Paraplegia |
| Zdroj: | The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine. 30:117-126 |
| ISSN: | 2045-7723 1079-0268 |
| DOI: | 10.1080/10790268.2007.11753922 |
| Popis: | Pressure ulcers are a serious complication for people with spinal cord injury (SCI). The Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine (CSCM) published clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) that provided guidance for pressure ulcer prevention and treatment after SCI. The aim of this study was to assess providers' perceptions for each of the 32 CPG recommendations regarding their agreement with CPGs, degree of CPG implementation, and CPG implementation barriers and facilitators.This descriptive mixed-methods study included both qualitative (focus groups) and quantitative (survey) data collection approaches. The sample (n = 60) included 24 physicians and 36 nurses who attended the 2004 annual national conferences of the American Paraplegia Society or American Association of Spinal Cord Injury Nurses. This sample drew from two sources: a purposive sample from a list of preregistered participants and a convenience sample of conference attendee volunteers. We analyzed quantitative data using descriptive statistics and qualitative data using a coding scheme to capture barriers and facilitators.The focus groups agreed unanimously on the substance of 6 of the 32 recommendations. Nurse and physician focus groups disagreed on the degree of CGP implementation at their sites, with nurses as a group perceiving less progress in implementation of the guideline recommendations. The focus groups identified only one recommendation, complications of surgery, as being fully implemented at their sites. Categories of barriers and facilitators for implementation of CPGs that emerged from the qualitative analysis included (a) characteristics of CPGs: need for research/evidence, (b) characteristics of CPGs: complexity of design and wording, (c) organizational factors, (d) lack of knowledge, and (e) lack of resources.Although generally SCI physicians and nurses agreed with the CPG recommendations as written, they did not feel these recommendations were fully implemented in their respective clinical settings. The focus groups identified multiple barriers to the implementation of the CPGs and suggested several facilitators/solutions to improve implementation of these guidelines in SCI. Participants identified organizational factors and the lack of knowledge as the most substantial systems/issues that created barriers to CPG implementation. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|