Efficiency of manual versus robotical (Zeus) assisted laparoscopic surgery in the performance of standardized tasks
| Autor: | M. S. Dunker, D. Nio, W. A. Bemelman, D. J. Gouma, K.T. Boer, T.M. Gulik |
|---|---|
| Přispěvatelé: | Surgery |
| Rok vydání: | 2001 |
| Předmět: |
Laparoscopic surgery
medicine.medical_specialty Students Medical medicine.diagnostic_test Swine business.industry Robotic assisted medicine.medical_treatment Robotics Endoscopy Surgery Task Performance and Analysis Performed Procedure Animals Medicine Laparoscopy business Man-Machine Systems Laparoscopic cholecystectomy Hypodermic needle Abdominal surgery |
| Zdroj: | Surgical endoscopy, 16(3), 412-415. Springer New York |
| ISSN: | 1432-2218 0930-2794 |
| Popis: | Background: The objective of this study was to compare the efficiency of manual and robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery. Methods: To evaluate the surgical efficiency in a set of basic endoscopic movements, 20 medical students without any surgical experience were selected to perform at random a set of laparoscopic tasks either manually or robotic assisted (Zeus). This task consisted of dropping beads into receptacles, running a 25-cm rope, capping a hypodermic needle, suturing, and performing a laparoscopic cholecystectomy on a cadaver liver of a pig. A quantitative time–action analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy and skill performance in terms of time and the number of actions. Results: The dropping beads exercise and the laparoscopic cholecystectomy required more time when performed with robotic assistance, as compared with manual performance (respectively, median, 78.5 s; range, 63 – 122 s vs median, 144.5 s; range, 100 – 169 s; p |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full text from SpringerLink