Effectiveness of additional deep-water running for disability, lumbar pain intensity, and functional capacity in patients with chronic low back pain: A randomised controlled trial with 3-month follow-up
| Autor: | Jefferson Rosa Cardoso, Rodrigo Gustavo da Silva Carvalho, Laís Faganello Dela Bela, Alexandre Roberto Marcondes Pelegrinelli, Josilainne Marcelino Dias, Mabel Micheline Olkoski, Ligia Maria Facci, Leandro C. Guenka, Renata Rosa de Campos, Mariana Felipe Silva, Maria S. T. Barreto |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2019 |
| Předmět: |
Adult
medicine.medical_specialty Visual analogue scale medicine.medical_treatment Physical Therapy Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation law.invention 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Lumbar Randomized controlled trial law medicine Aerobic exercise Humans 030212 general & internal medicine Hydrotherapy business.industry Lumbosacral Region Water Confidence interval Intensity (physics) Exercise Therapy Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire Physical therapy business Low Back Pain 030217 neurology & neurosurgery Follow-Up Studies |
| Zdroj: | Musculoskeletal sciencepractice. 49 |
| ISSN: | 2468-7812 |
| Popis: | Background Aquatic exercise (AQE) programme is commonly used as an alternative to the chronic low back pain (CLBP) treatment. The addition of aquatic aerobic exercises to AQE may be beneficial to patients with CLBP. Design Randomised controlled trial. Objectives To assess the effectiveness of AQE with the addition of aerobic exercise - deep-water running (DWR) - compared to exclusive AQE in improving disability, lumbar pain intensity, and functional capacity in patients with CLBP. Methods Fifty-four adult patients with CLBP were randomised either to the experimental group (AQE + DWR) or the control group (AQE). An assessor who was blinded to the group allocation performed both pre- and post-interventions assessments. Both treatments lasted 9 weeks, with a 3-month follow-up. The primary outcome was disability, as evaluated using the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire. The secondary outcomes were pain and functional capacity; pain was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS), and functional capacity (travelled distance) was measured using the 6-min walk test (6WT). Results A significant difference in pain was observed between groups after intervention in favour of DWR (mean difference −1.3 cm [95% confidence interval (CI) −2.17 to −0.45], d ‾ = 0.80 [95% CI 0.22 to 1.33]). Conclusion Treatment with DWR was effective in the short term for achieving the desired outcome of pain reduction when compared with AQE only but not for disability and functional capacity. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full Text from ScienceDirect