Catheter use in regional anesthesia: pros and cons

Autor: Xavier Capdevila, Paudie Delaney, Olivier Choquet, Alparslan Apan, Gabriella Iohom
Přispěvatelé: Fakülteler, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon Ana Bilim Dalı, Apan, Alparslan, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [Montpellier] (CHRU Montpellier), University College Cork (UCC), Giresun University
Rok vydání: 2019
Předmět:
Zdroj: Minerva Anestesiologica
Minerva Anestesiologica, Edizione Minerva Medica, 2019, 85 (12), ⟨10.23736/S0375-9393.19.13581-X⟩
BASE-Bielefeld Academic Search Engine
ISSN: 1827-1596
0375-9393
DOI: 10.23736/S0375-9393.19.13581-X⟩
Popis: capdevila, xavier/0000-0002-9791-8779 WOS: 000503499600014 PubMed: 31630506 Continuous peripheral nerve blocks refer to a local anesthetic solution administered via perineurally placed catheters in an effort to extend the benefits of a single-shot peripheral nerve block. They offer several advantages in the postoperative period including excellent analgesia, reduced opioid consumption and associated side effects, enhanced rehabilitation and improved patient satisfaction. The current trend towards less invasive, one-day surgery and enhanced recovery programs may decrease the requirement of catheter use. Prolonged motor block in particular is associated with undesirable outcomes. Should we routinely use continuous peripheral nerve blocks in our daily practice? This PRO-CON debate aims at answering the question from the experts' perspectives. Fascial compartment and wound catheters are outside the scope of this debate.
Databáze: OpenAIRE