English-based Pediatric Emergency Medicine Software Improves Physician Test Performance on Common Pediatric Emergencies: A Multicenter Study in Vietnam

Autor: Trevor N. Brooks, Daniel R. Kievlan, Robert M. Rodriguez, Jamie L. Sharp, Alex C. Miller, Le Thanh Hai, Tu Nguyen, Ronald A. Dieckmann, Michelle Lin
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2013
Předmět:
Zdroj: Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, Vol 14, Iss 5, Pp 471-476 (2013)
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
Lin, Michelle; Brooks, Trevor N; Miller, Alex C; Sharp, Jamie L; Hai, Le Thanh; Nguyen, Tu; et al.(2013). English-based Pediatric Emergency Medicine Software Improves Physician Test Performance on Common Pediatric Emergencies: A Multicenter Study in Vietnam. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 14(5). doi: 10.5811/westjem.2013.4.15090. Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/4mx9p2fp
ISSN: 1936-9018
DOI: 10.5811/westjem.2013.4.15090.
Popis: Introduction: Global health agencies and the Vietnam Ministry of Health have identified pediatric emergency care and health information technology as high priority goals. Clinical decision support (CDS) software provides physicians with access to current literature to answer clinical queries, but there is limited impact data in developing countries. We hypothesized that Vietnamese physicians will demonstrate improved test performance on common pediatric emergencies using CDS technologies despite being in English. Methods: This multicenter, prospective, pretest-posttest study was conducted in 11 Vietnamese hospitals enrolled a convenience sample of physicians who attended an 80-minute software training on a pediatric CDS software (PEMSoft). Two multiple-choice exams (A, B) were administered before and after the session. Participants, who received Test A as a pretest, received Test B as a posttest, and vice versa. Participants used the CDS software for the posttest. The primary outcome measure was the mean percentage difference in physician scores between the pretest and posttest, as calculated by a paired, two-tailed t-test. Results: For the 203 participants, the mean pretest, posttest, and improvement scores were 37% (95% CI: 35-38%), 70% (95% CI: 68-72%), and 33% (95% CI: 30-36%), respectively, with p
Databáze: OpenAIRE