A comparison of longitudinal modelling approaches: Alcohol and cannabis use from adolescence to young adulthood
Autor: | Jennifer McIntosh, Lauryn J Hagg, George J. Youssef, Ann Sanson, Delyse Hutchinson, Christopher J Greenwood, Jacqueline A Macdonald, Primrose Letcher, Elizabeth Spry, Craig A. Olsson, Kim Betts, John W. Toumbourou |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2019 |
Předmět: |
Adult
Male Longitudinal study Adolescent Alcohol Drinking Substance-Related Disorders Negative binomial distribution Poison control Toxicology Young Adult 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine medicine Econometrics Humans Entropy (information theory) Pharmacology (medical) Longitudinal Studies 030212 general & internal medicine Pharmacology Models Statistical Australia Reproducibility of Results Human factors and ergonomics medicine.disease Latent class model Substance abuse Psychiatry and Mental health Latent Class Analysis Female Marijuana Use Psychology 030217 neurology & neurosurgery Strengths and weaknesses |
Zdroj: | Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 201:58-64 |
ISSN: | 0376-8716 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.05.001 |
Popis: | Background Modelling trajectories of substance use over time is complex and requires judicious choices from a number of modelling approaches. In this study we examine the relative strengths and weakness of latent curve models (LCM), growth mixture modelling (GMM), and latent class growth analysis (LCGA). Design Data were drawn from the Australian Temperament Project, a 36-year-old community-based longitudinal study that has followed a sample of young Australians from infancy to adulthood across 16 waves of follow-up since 1983. Models were fitted on past month alcohol use (n = 1468) and cannabis use (n = 549) across six waves of data collected from age 13–14 to 27–28 years. Findings Of the three model types, GMMs were the best fit. However, these models were limited given the variance of numerous growth parameters had to be constrained to zero. Additionally, both the GMM and LCGA solutions had low entropy. The negative binomial LCMs provided a relatively well-fitting solution with fewer drawbacks in terms of growth parameter estimation and entropy issues. In all cases, model fit was enhanced when using a negative binomial distribution. Conclusions Substance use researchers would benefit from adopting a complimentary framework by exploring both LCMs and mixture approaches, in light of the relative strengths and weaknesses as identified. Additionally, the distribution of data should inform modelling decisions. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |