| Autor: |
Rebecca Enterline, Jeffrey Mlakar, Mark A. Griswold, Galen Tingle, S. W. Simpson, Gotschall Robert, M. Stojanovska, Susanne Wish-Baratz, A. Boscia, S. Simonson-Shick, Erin Henninger, K. A. Herrmann, Lauren Ulrey, Eastman Henry, Lisa Tan |
| Rok vydání: |
2021 |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Med Sci Educ |
| ISSN: |
2156-8650 |
| Popis: |
PURPOSE: As the amount of curricular material required of medical students increases, less time is available for anatomy; thus, methods to teach anatomy more efficiently and effectively are necessary. In this randomized controlled trial, we looked at the effectiveness of a mixed reality (MR) device to teach musculoskeletal anatomy to medical students compared with traditional cadaveric dissection. METHOD: Participating students were divided into three cohorts. Cohort 1 first studied upper limb anatomy in MR followed by lower limb anatomy through cadaveric dissection. Cohort 2 studied upper limb anatomy with cadaveric dissection followed by lower limb anatomy in MR. After the six sessions, a third cohort of 33 students who never received any teaching in MR was recruited to participate in the final practical exams as a control group. All 64 students completed two practical exams with equivalent content, one in the cadaver lab and one using MR. RESULTS: The average scores were 73.8% + 12.3 on the cadaver exam and 74.2% + 13.0 in MR. There is no statistical difference between these scores (p > 0.05). A correlation was found between the MR practical exam and cadaver practical exam scores (r = 0.74, p < 0.01) across all students. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this study marks the first time that MR was compared with traditional anatomy learning modalities in a multi-session, group course. Our results clearly indicate that medical students, regardless of the study modality, performed similarly on the MR and the cadaver practical exams. |
| Databáze: |
OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full text from SpringerLink