Outcome and predictors of interstitial radiosurgery in the treatment of gelastic epilepsy
| Autor: | F. V. Deimling, Susanne Fauser, Andreas Schulze-Bonhage, Joachim Spreer, Bernhard J. Steinhoff, Michael Trippel, Ostertag Cb, Thomas U. Mayer, R. Keimer, Alois Ebner, Thomas Bast, Christian E. Elger, Kathrin Wagner |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2008 |
| Předmět: |
Adult
Lethargy Male Adolescent Side effect Hamartoma medicine.medical_treatment Brachytherapy Hypothalamus Brain Edema Weight Gain Radiosurgery Cohort Studies Iodine Radioisotopes Stereotaxic Techniques Epilepsy Gelastic seizure Humans Medicine Child business.industry Headache Recovery of Function Perioperative Middle Aged medicine.disease Magnetic Resonance Imaging Treatment Outcome Child Preschool Anesthesia Stereotaxic technique Female Epilepsies Partial Neurology (clinical) medicine.symptom Cognition Disorders business Hypothalamic Diseases Follow-Up Studies |
| Zdroj: | Neurology. 71:277-282 |
| ISSN: | 1526-632X 0028-3878 |
| DOI: | 10.1212/01.wnl.0000318279.92233.82 |
| Popis: | Background: Gelastic epilepsy due to hypothalamic hamartomas is usually a severe condition encompassing both epileptic seizures and an epileptic encephalopathy associated with behavioral and cognitive impairments. Here we report the effects of interstitial radiosurgery in the treatment of this generally pharmacoresistant epilepsy syndrome. Methods: Twenty-four consecutive patients (3–46 years of age, 7 women, mean age 21.9 years, mean duration of epilepsy 17.6 years) with gelastic epilepsy due to MR-ascertained hypothalamic hamartoma and a minimum follow-up period of 1 year were included in this evaluation. Treatment was performed by interstitial radiosurgery using stereotactically implanted 125 I seeds. Effects of treatment on seizure frequency and possible side effects were assessed prospectively. Factors influencing outcome and side effects were analyzed statistically. Results: After a mean 24-month follow-up period following the last radiosurgical treatment, 11/24 patients were seizure free or had seizure reduction of at least 90% (Engel class I and II), in some cases only after repeated treatment. The duration of epilepsy prior to radiosurgery negatively influenced outcome. Treatment was well tolerated in most patients. Headache, fatigue, and lethargy were transient side effects associated with the development of brain edema extending from the implantation site in five patients. Four patients had a weight gain of more than 5 kg which was severe in two patients. The majority of those patients whose cognitive functions initially deteriorated showed subsequent recovery of cognitive functions, but episodic memory in two patients showed persistent decline at 1 year follow-up. Longer disease duration increased the risk for cognitive side effects, and larger hamartoma size and eccentric seed positioning increased the risk for radiogenic brain edema. Neither perioperative mortality nor neurologic impairments, visual field defects, or endocrinologic disturbances were encountered following treatment. Conclusion: Interstitial radiosurgery was efficacious in significantly improving gelastic epilepsy in about half of the patients treated in this series. Weight gain may occur as a side effect, whereas other severe side effects reported following microsurgical removal of the hamartoma were absent. The study results strongly suggest early causal treatment, as chances for seizure control are higher and the risk for cognitive side effects is lower in patients with shorter disease duration. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|