Compression-Only Versus Rescue-Breathing Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation After Pediatric Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
| Autor: | Rita V. Burke, David Markenson, Bryan McNally, Heather Griffis, Vinay M. Nadkarni, Victoria L. Vetter, Lihai Song, Maryam Y. Naim, Joseph W. Rossano, Richard N Bradley, Robert A. Berg, Kimberly Vellano |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
Male
Adolescent medicine.medical_treatment education Out of hospital cardiac arrest health services administration medicine Humans Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation Registries cardiovascular diseases Cardiopulmonary resuscitation Child health care economics and organizations business.industry Infant Respiration Artificial Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation United States Child Preschool Anesthesia Breathing Bystander cpr Female Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine business therapeutics Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest |
| Zdroj: | Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 78:1042-1052 |
| ISSN: | 0735-1097 |
| Popis: | There are conflicting data regarding the benefit of compression-only bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CO-CPR) compared with CPR with rescue breathing (RB-CPR) after pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).This study sought to test the hypothesis that RB-CPR is associated with improved neurologically favorable survival compared with CO-CPR following pediatric OHCA, and to characterize age-stratified outcomes with CPR type compared with no bystander CPR (NO-CPR).Analysis of the CARES registry (Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival) for nontraumatic pediatric OHCAs (patients aged ≤18 years) from 2013-2019 was performed. Age groups included infants (1 year), children (1 to 11 years), and adolescents (≥12 years). The primary outcome was neurologically favorable survival at hospital discharge.Of 13,060 pediatric OHCAs, 46.5% received bystander CPR. CO-CPR was the most common bystander CPR type. In the overall cohort, neurologically favorable survival was associated with RB-CPR (adjusted OR: 2.16; 95% CI: 1.78-2.62) and CO-CPR (adjusted OR: 1.61; 95% CI: 1.34-1.94) compared with NO-CPR. RB-CPR was associated with a higher odds of neurologically favorable survival compared with CO-CPR (adjusted OR: 1.36; 95% CI: 1.10-1.68). In age-stratified analysis, RB-CPR was associated with better neurologically favorable survival versus NO-CPR in all age groups. CO-CPR was associated with better neurologically favorable survival compared with NO-CPR in children and adolescents, but not in infants.CO-CPR was the most common type of bystander CPR in pediatric OHCA. RB-CPR was associated with better outcomes compared with CO-CPR. These results support present guidelines for RB-CPR as the preferred CPR modality for pediatric OHCA. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|