Immediate vs Delayed Stenting in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Rationale and Design of the International PRIMACY Bayesian Randomized Controlled Trial
Autor: | Lars Køber, Thomas Engstrøm, Grégoire Rangé, Patrick Bélisle, E. Marc Jolicoeur, Nicolas Delarche, Brahim Harbaoui, Colin Berry, David Carrick, Michael McGillion, Jean-François Tanguay, Géraud Souteyrand, Frédéric Bouisset, François Roubille, Simon Kouz, Samer Mansour, Jean-Claude Tardif, Dan Eik Høfsten, Guillaume Cayla, James M. Brophy, Erick Schampaert, Cheol Woong Yu, Gilles Zemour, Loic Belle, Nandini Dendukuri, Henning Kelbæk, X. Marcaggi, Ziad Boueri |
---|---|
Přispěvatelé: | MORNET, Dominique, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada., Centre for Outcomes Research, McGill University Health Centre-Research Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, HOPITAL CHARTRES - DEPT CARDIOL, Montreal Health Innovation Coordination Center, Montreal, Quebec, CHU Estaing [Clermont-Ferrand], CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Service Cardiologie [CHU Toulouse], Pôle Cardiovasculaire et Métabolique [CHU Toulouse], Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse (CHU Toulouse)-Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse (CHU Toulouse), Centre Hospitalier de Cannes (Centre Hospitalier de Cannes), Centre Hospitalier de Cannes, Centre hospitalier de Pau, Imagerie Ultrasonore, Centre de Recherche en Acquisition et Traitement de l'Image pour la Santé (CREATIS), Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (UCBL), Université de Lyon-Université de Lyon-Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon (INSA Lyon), Université de Lyon-Institut National des Sciences Appliquées (INSA)-Institut National des Sciences Appliquées (INSA)-Hospices Civils de Lyon (HCL)-Université Jean Monnet - Saint-Étienne (UJM)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (UCBL), Université de Lyon-Institut National des Sciences Appliquées (INSA)-Institut National des Sciences Appliquées (INSA)-Hospices Civils de Lyon (HCL)-Université Jean Monnet - Saint-Étienne (UJM)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Hopital Sacre-Coeur, Interventional Cardiology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Centre Hospitalier Régional de Lanaudiere [Joliette, QC, Canada] (CHRDL), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes (CHU Nîmes), Physiologie & médecine expérimentale du Cœur et des Muscles [U 1046] (PhyMedExp), Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Université de Montpellier (UM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [Montpellier] (CHRU Montpellier), Hôpital de Bastia, Ctr Hosp Vichy, Montreal Heart Institute Coordinating Centre (MHICC), Université de Montréal (UdeM), Montreal Heart Institute - Institut de Cardiologie de Montréal, Department of Cardiology, Gentofte University Hospital, Rigshospitalet [Copenhagen], Copenhagen University Hospital, Service de Cardiologie, Centre hospitalier de la région d'Annecy, Service de cardiologie [Toulouse], Hôpital de Rangueil, CHU Toulouse [Toulouse]-CHU Toulouse [Toulouse], Université Jean Monnet [Saint-Étienne] (UJM)-Hospices Civils de Lyon (HCL)-Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon (INSA Lyon), Université de Lyon-Institut National des Sciences Appliquées (INSA)-Université de Lyon-Institut National des Sciences Appliquées (INSA)-Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (UCBL), Université de Lyon-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Université Jean Monnet [Saint-Étienne] (UJM)-Hospices Civils de Lyon (HCL)-Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon (INSA Lyon), Université de Lyon-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Centre Hospitalier Régional de Lanaudiere, Joliette, Quebec, Université de Montpellier (UM)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) |
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2020 |
Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
medicine.medical_treatment [SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio] 030204 cardiovascular system & hematology Prosthesis Design law.invention Time-to-Treatment 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Randomized controlled trial law St elevation myocardial infarction Internal medicine medicine Humans cardiovascular diseases 030212 general & internal medicine Myocardial infarction ComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUS Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic business.industry Antithrombin Stent Percutaneous coronary intervention Bayes Theorem medicine.disease 3. Good health [SDV] Life Sciences [q-bio] surgical procedures operative medicine.anatomical_structure Heart failure Cardiology ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Stents Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine business medicine.drug Artery |
Zdroj: | Canadian Journal of Cardiology Canadian Journal of Cardiology, 2020, ⟨10.1016/j.cjca.2020.01.019⟩ Canadian Journal of Cardiology, Elsevier, 2020, ⟨10.1016/j.cjca.2020.01.019⟩ |
ISSN: | 0828-282X 1916-7075 |
Popis: | Background Primary percutaneous coronary intervention is used to restore blood flow in the infarct-related coronary artery, followed by immediate stenting to prevent reocclusion. Stents implanted in thrombus-laden arteries cause distal embolization, which paradoxically impairs myocardial reperfusion and ventricular function. Whether a strategy of delayed stenting improves outcomes in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is uncertain. Methods The Primary Reperfusion Secondary Stenting (PRIMACY) is a Bayesian prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded end point trial in which delayed vs immediate stenting in patients with STEMI were compared for prevention of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, heart failure, or unplanned target vessel revascularization at 9 months. All participants were immediately reperfused, but those assigned to the delayed arm underwent stenting after an interval of 24 to 48 hours. This interval was bridged with antithrombin therapy to reduce thrombus burden. In the principal Bayesian hierarchical random effects analysis, data from exchangeable trials will be combined into a study prior and updated with PRIMACY into a posterior probability of efficacy. Results A total of 305 participants were randomized across 15 centres in France and Canada between April 2014 and September 2017. At baseline, the median age of participants was 59 years, 81% were male, and 3% had a history of percutaneous coronary intervention. Results from PRIMACY will be updated from the patient-level data of 1568 participants enrolled in the Deferred Stent Trial in STEMI (DEFER; United Kingdom), Minimalist Immediate Mechanical Intervention (MIMI; France), Danish Trial in Acute Myocardial Infarction-3 (DANAMI-3; Denmark), and Impact of Immediate Stent Implantation Versus Deferred Stent Implantation on Infarct Size and Microvascular Perfusion in Patients With ST Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction (INNOVATION, South Korea) trials. Conclusions We expect to clarify whether delayed stenting can safely reduce the occurrence of adverse cardiovascular end points compared with immediate stenting in patients with STEMI. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |