Motivations, Barriers, and Outcomes of Patient-Reported Shared Decision Making in Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Autor: | Allisa Paliana, Ellyn Kodroff, Melissa Scott, Joy W. Chang, Jessica L. Mellinger, Wendy Book, Kathleen Sable, Joel H. Rubenstein, Denise Mack, Mary Jo Strobel, Scholeigh (Shay) M. Kyle, Evan S. Dellon |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2020 |
Předmět: |
Financial costs
Adult Male medicine.medical_specialty Adolescent Physiology Disease Logistic regression Patient advocacy Article 03 medical and health sciences Young Adult 0302 clinical medicine medicine Humans Adverse effect Eosinophilic esophagitis Child Motivation Descriptive statistics business.industry Patient choice Gastroenterologists Gastroenterology Eosinophilic Esophagitis Middle Aged medicine.disease Cross-Sectional Studies Treatment Outcome 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis Family medicine Child Preschool 030211 gastroenterology & hepatology Female Patient Participation business Decision Making Shared |
Zdroj: | Dig Dis Sci |
ISSN: | 1573-2568 |
Popis: | BACKGROUND: Little is known about patient choice in treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). AIM: Determine motivators and barriers to using common EoE therapies and describe patient-reported shared decision making (SDM) and satisfaction with treatment. METHODS: We developed and administered a Web-based survey on factors influencing EoE treatment choice, SDM, and satisfaction. Adults with EoE and adult caregivers of pediatric EoE patients were recruited via patient advocacy groups and at two centers. Descriptive statistics of multiple response questions and multivariable logistic regression were performed to identify predictors of SDM and satisfaction with treatment. RESULTS: A total of 243 adults (mean age 38.7 years) and 270 adult caregivers of children (mean age 9.5 years) completed the survey. Preventing worsening disease was the most common motivator to treat EoE. Barriers to topical steroids were potential side effects, cost, and preferring a medication-free approach. Inconvenience and quality of life were barriers to diet. Potential adverse events, discomfort, and cost were barriers to dilation. Nearly half (42%) of patients experienced low SDM, but those followed by gastroenterologists were more likely to experience greater SDM compared to non-specialists (OR 1.81; 95% CI 1.03–3.15). Patients receiving more SDM were more satisfied with treatment, regardless of provider or treatment type (OR 2.62, 95% CI 1.76–3.92). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with EoE pursue treatment mostly to prevent worsening disease. Common barriers to treatment are inconvenience and financial costs. SDM is practiced most by gastroenterologists, but nearly half of patients do not experience SDM, indicating a substantial area of need in EoE. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |