Efficacy of Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy in the detection of colorectal polyps
Autor: | Yoko Wada, Yumiko Fukuma, Masahiro Wada, Kazuo Ohtsuka, Masayoshi Fukuda, Mamoru Watanabe, Yoshiki Wada |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2018 |
Předmět: |
Original article
medicine.medical_specialty Adenoma medicine.diagnostic_test Colorectal cancer business.industry Colonoscopy Gold standard (test) Withdrawal time medicine.disease Gastroenterology Endoscopy 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis Internal medicine medicine 030211 gastroenterology & hepatology Pharmacology (medical) lcsh:Diseases of the digestive system. Gastroenterology Stage (cooking) lcsh:RC799-869 Prospective cohort study business |
Zdroj: | Endoscopy International Open, Vol 06, Iss 04, Pp E425-E431 (2018) Endoscopy International Open |
ISSN: | 2196-9736 2364-3722 |
DOI: | 10.1055/s-0044-101142 |
Popis: | Background and study aims Colonoscopy is the gold standard for detecting colorectal adenomas and cancers. Endoscopic surveillance has been shown to be effective for preventing colorectal cancer. Although detection of colorectal polyps at an early stage is important, endoscopic visualization of early neoplasia can be difficult. The Endocuff is a new device that can be attached to the tip of the colonoscope to hold the colonic folds away from the field of view during withdrawal. The aim of this study was to compare the adenoma detection rate (ADR) and the mean number of adenomas detected per patient (MAP) achieved using Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy (EAC) and standard colonoscopy (SC). Patients and methods This randomized prospective study was conducted at two academic endoscopy departments in Japan. A total of 447 patients underwent a complete colonoscopic examination between April 2015 and September 2015. The EAC group included 239 patients. The cecal intubation rate, insertion time, withdrawal time, pain score, complications, polyp detection rate (PDR), ADR, the mean number of polyps detected per patient (MPP), and the MAP were assessed. Results There were no differences between the EAC and SC groups in terms of cecal intubation rate, insertion time, withdrawal time, or pain scores. The PDR in patients increased by about 12 % (61.9 % vs. 49.2 %, P = 0.013) and ADR increased by 15 % (52.5 % vs. 39.2 %, P = 0.001) with the use of the Endocuff. The advanced ADR was higher in the EAC group but no statistically significant difference was found (7.7 % vs. 4.6 %, P = 0.17). Both MPP and MAP were also higher in the EAC group (mean ± SD: 1.33 ± 1.43 vs. 0.83 ± 0.99 per patient; P Conclusions EAC not only enabled a higher ADR but also significantly increased the mean number of adenomas identified per patient, as compared with SC. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |