Indacaterol/Glycopyrronium versus Salmeterol/Fluticasone in Patients with COPD-A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in the Czech Republic
| Autor: | J Skoupá, Viktor Kasak, Tomas Valena, Jiri Klimes |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2018 |
| Předmět: |
Male
medicine.medical_specialty Cost effectiveness Cost-Benefit Analysis Economics Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous) Muscarinic Antagonists Quinolones Fluticasone propionate 03 medical and health sciences Pulmonary Disease Chronic Obstructive 0302 clinical medicine Quality of life Internal medicine Medicine Humans 030212 general & internal medicine Pharmacology Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (miscellaneous) health care economics and organizations Czech Republic COPD business.industry Health Policy Cost-effectiveness analysis medicine.disease Glycopyrrolate Fluticasone-Salmeterol Drug Combination Bronchodilator Agents 030228 respiratory system Tolerability Indans Indacaterol Female Salmeterol Quality-Adjusted Life Years business medicine.drug |
| Zdroj: | Value in health regional issues. 16 |
| ISSN: | 2212-1102 |
| Popis: | Background Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) represents an illness with significant healthcare and societal impacts. Fixed combinations of long-acting beta-agonists (LABA) and inhaled corticosteroids have been used for COPD treatment as the standard of care for many years. A daily dose of indacaterol and glycopyrronium (IND/GLY) at 110/50 µg has recently been gaining attention due to its improved efficacy and tolerability versus the standard of care.The study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of once daily IND/GLY vs. twice daily salmeterol/fluticasone propionate (SFC) at 50/500 µg in COPD patients. Methods A microsimulation model in MS Excel was adapted to the Czech setting. Effectiveness data and disease severity stages were obtained from the FLAME study, which is a head-to head trial comparing IND/GLY vs. SFC. Quality of life data were derived from a literature review. Costs (medication, monitoring and complications) were taken from published Czech sources. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was expressed as cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Costs and outcomes were discounted at 3 %. A lifetime horizon was used for the analysis. Cost-effectiveness was studied from the perspective of a health care system in the Czech Republic. Results Mean QALYs were higher in the IND/GLY arm (difference 0.167 QALYs). The ICER of IND/GLY compared with SFC was €13,628 per QALY gained. Deterministic sensitivity analyses and probabilistic sensitivity analyses confirmed the base-case result to be robust. Conclusions From the perspective of the Czech health care system, managing COPD using IND/GLY is cost-effective in this analysis because the base-case is clearly below the willingness-to-pay threshold in the Czech Republic, which is automatically set at 3 times GDP/capita (approximately €44,000/ QALY). This is the first available economic analysis utilizing FLAME study results in the Central East European (CEE) countries showing IND/ GLY as a highly cost-effective investment into COPD patients. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full Text from ScienceDirect