Variation in gravimetric correction factors for nephelometer-derived estimates of personal exposure to PM2.5
| Autor: | Ander Wilson, Jennifer L. Peel, Nicholas Good, John Volckens, Jessica Tryner, Maggie L. Clark |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2019 |
| Předmět: |
010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences
Health Toxicology and Mutagenesis Analytical chemistry 010501 environmental sciences Toxicology 01 natural sciences Article Light scattering Limit of Detection Nephelometry and Turbidimetry Humans Mass concentration (chemistry) Particle Size 0105 earth and related environmental sciences Aerosols Detection limit Air Pollutants Nephelometer Environmental Exposure General Medicine Pollution Aerosol Environmental science Gravimetric analysis Particulate Matter Particle size Nephelometry Filtration Environmental Monitoring |
| Zdroj: | Environ Pollut |
| ISSN: | 0269-7491 |
| Popis: | Many portable monitors for quantifying mass concentrations of particulate matter air pollution rely on aerosol light scattering as the measurement method; however, the relationship between scattered light (what is measured) and aerosol mass concentration (the metric of interest) is a complex function of the refractive index, size distribution, and shape of the particles. In this study, we compared 33-hour personal PM(2.5) concentrations measured simultaneously using nephelometry (personal DataRAM pDR-1200) and gravimetric filter sampling for working adults (44 participants, 249 samples). Nephelometer- and filter-derived 33-hour average PM(2.5) concentrations were correlated (Spearman’s ρ = 0.77); however, the nephelometer-derived concentration was within 20% of the filter-derived concentration for only 13% of samples. The nephelometer/filter ratio, which is used to correct light-scattering measurements to a gravimetric sample, had a median value of 0.52 and varied by over a factor of three (10(th) percentile = 0.35, 90(th) percentile = 1.1). When 33-hour samples with >50% of 10-s average nephelometer readings below the nephelometer limit of detection were removed from the dataset during sensitivity analyses, the fraction of nephelometer-derived concentrations that were within 20% of the filter-derived concentration increased to 25%. We also evaluated how much the accuracy of nephelometer-derived concentrations improved after applying: (1) a median correction factor derived from a subset of 44 gravimetric samples, (2) participant-specific correction factors derived from one same from each subject, and (3) correction factors predicted using linear models based on other variables recorded during the study. Each approach independently increased the fraction of nephelometer-derived concentrations that were within 20% of the filter-derived concentration to approximately 45%. These results illustrate the challenges with using light scattering (without correction to a concurrent gravimetric sample) to estimate personal exposure to PM(2.5) mass among mobile adults exposed to low daily average concentrations (median = 8 μg·m(−3) in this study). |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full Text from ScienceDirect