Mechanical Effect of Posterior Wire or Half-Pin Configuration on Stabilization Utilizing a Model of Circular External Fixation of the Foot
| Autor: | Mikhail L. Samchukov, Dwight G. Bronson, John G. Birch, Michael B. Younes, Thomas M. Rocchio |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2004 |
| Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
External fixator External Fixators medicine.medical_treatment Bone Nails Models Biological Biomechanical Phenomena 03 medical and health sciences External fixation 0302 clinical medicine Fracture Fixation Humans Medicine Orthopedics and Sports Medicine Bone Wires Orthodontics 030222 orthopedics Foot business.industry Biomechanics 030229 sport sciences Surgery Calcaneus Foot surgery business Foot (unit) |
| Zdroj: | Foot & Ankle International. 25:136-143 |
| ISSN: | 1944-7876 1071-1007 |
| DOI: | 10.1177/107110070402500305 |
| Popis: | Background: Numerous studies have addressed biomechanical characteristics of circular external fixation of long bones. The objective of the present study was to evaluate stabilization of a simulated foot model using external fixation with either calcaneal tensioned stopper wires or half-pins. Methods: Fixation configurations of the calcaneus included two parallel wires, two wires crossing at either 30° or 45°, a 4-mm- and 5-mm-diameter single half-pin, or two half-pins inserted at a cross-angle of either 45° or 90°. All frames were tested in axial compression, anteroposterior (AP) bending, and mediolateral (ML) bending. Results: An increase in wire cross-angle improved the axial and AP bending stabilization but had no influence on ML bending. Utilization of a single calcaneal half-pin instead of two cross-wires resulted in a considerable reduction in ML bending stabilization. Frame configurations with two half-pins substantially improved axial and ML bending stabilization. Due to the medial location of the metatarsal wire stopper, an increase in half-pin cross-angle significantly improved ML bending stiffness under lateral foot loading. Under the medial foot loading, however, the half-pin cross-angle had no effect on ML bending stabilization. Replacement of cross-wires with two half-pins significantly improved the AP bending stiffness only when the half-pin cross-angle was reduced to 45°. In all modes of two half-pin frame loading, the half-pin diameter had a substantial effect on foot stabilization. Conclusions: Although the wire cross-angle, half-pin cross-angle, and half-pin diameter affect the stability of foot circular external fixation, the influence of these mechanical parameters on foot stabilization is dependent on the mode and location of loading. Clinical Relevance: The results of the present mechanical testing can be utilized as a useful guideline for the optimization of circular external fixation of the foot. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|