Cesarean delivery rates among family physicians versus obstetricians: a population-based cohort study using instrumental variable methods
| Autor: | Kris Aubrey-Bassler, Jessica Bishop, Susan Avery, Amanda Pendergast, Kelly Monaghan, Norah Duggan, Russell Eric Dawe |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2017 |
| Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
education.field_of_study 030219 obstetrics & reproductive medicine business.industry Obstetrics Research Birth weight Population Gestational age General Medicine Logistic regression Confidence interval 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Relative risk Cohort Medicine 030212 general & internal medicine business education reproductive and urinary physiology Cohort study |
| Zdroj: | CMAJ Open. 5:E823-E829 |
| ISSN: | 2291-0026 |
| DOI: | 10.9778/cmajo.20170081 |
| Popis: | BACKGROUND Previous research suggests that family physicians have rates of cesarean delivery that are lower than or equivalent to those for obstetricians, but adjustments for risk differences in these analyses may have been inadequate. We used an econometric method to adjust for observed and unobserved factors affecting the risk of cesarean delivery among women attended by family physicians versus obstetricians. METHODS This retrospective population-based cohort study included all Canadian (except Quebec) hospital deliveries by family physicians and obstetricians between Apr. 1, 2006, and Mar. 31, 2009. We excluded women with multiple gestations, and newborns with a birth weight less than 500 g or gestational age less than 20 weeks. We estimated the relative risk of cesarean delivery using instrumental-variable-adjusted and logistic regression. RESULTS The final cohort included 776 299 women who gave birth in 390 hospitals. The risk of cesarean delivery was 27.3%, and the mean proportion of deliveries by family physicians was 26.9% (standard deviation 23.8%). The relative risk of cesarean delivery for family physicians versus obstetricians was 0.48 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41-0.56) with logistic regression and 1.27 (95% CI 1.02-1.57) with instrumental-variable-adjusted regression. INTERPRETATION Our conventional analyses suggest that family physicians have a lower rate of cesarean delivery than obstetricians, but instrumental variable analyses suggest the opposite. Because instrumental variable methods adjust for unmeasured factors and traditional methods do not, the large discrepancy between these estimates of risk suggests that clinical and/or sociocultural factors affecting the decision to perform cesarean delivery may not be accounted for in our database. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|