Screening for sickle cell disease in newborns: a systematic review
Autor: | Ulrike Paschen, Birgit Klüppelholz, Anne Rummer, Wiebke Sieben, Ulrike Lampert, Konstanze Angelescu, Claudia Bollig, Martina Markes, Britta Runkel |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2020 |
Předmět: |
Newborn screening
Pediatrics medicine.medical_specialty MEDLINE lcsh:Medicine Medicine (miscellaneous) Anemia Sickle Cell Disease Anaemia—sickle cell 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine medicine Humans Mass Screening 030212 general & internal medicine Child business.industry Research lcsh:R Infant Newborn Retrospective cohort study Odds ratio Haemolysis Confidence interval Systematic review 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis SCD screening business |
Zdroj: | Systematic Reviews, Vol 9, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2020) Systematic Reviews |
ISSN: | 2046-4053 |
DOI: | 10.1186/s13643-020-01504-5 |
Popis: | BackgroundSickle cell disease (SCD) is an inherited autosomal recessive disorder caused by the replacement of normal haemoglobin (HbA) by mutant Hb (sickle Hb, HbS). The sickle-shaped red blood cells lead to haemolysis and vaso-occlusion. Especially in the first years of life, patients with SCD are at high risk of life-threatening complications. SCD prevalence shows large regional variations; the disease predominantly occurs in sub-Saharan Africa. We aimed to systematically assess the evidence on the benefit of newborn screening for SCD followed by an earlier treatment start.MethodsWe systematically searched bibliographic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Databases, and the Health Technology Assessment Database), trial registries, and other sources to identify systematic reviews and randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or non-randomised trials on newborn screening for SCD. The last search was in 07/2020. Two reviewers independently reviewed abstracts and full-text articles and assessed the risk of bias of the studies included. Data were extracted by one person and checked by another. As meta-analyses were not possible, a qualitative summary of results was performed.ResultsWe identified 1 eligible study with direct evidence: a Jamaican retrospective study evaluating newborn screening for SCD followed by preventive measures (prevention of infections and education of parents). The study included 500 patients with SCD (intervention group, 395; historical control group, 105). Although the results showed a high risk of bias, the difference between the intervention and the control group was very large: mortality in children decreased by a factor of about 10 in the first 5 years of life (0.02% in the intervention group vs. 0.19% in the control group, odds ratio 0.09; 95% confidence interval [0.04; 0.22],p< 0.001).ConclusionThe results are based on a single retrospective study including historical controls. However, the decrease of mortality by a factor of 10 is unlikely to be explained by bias alone. Therefore, in terms of mortality, data from this single retrospective study included in our systematic review suggest a benefit of newborn screening for SCD (followed by preventive measures) versus no newborn screening for SCD (weak certainty of conclusions). |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |