Influence of Charging Losses on Energy Consumption and CO2 Emissions of Battery-Electric Vehicles
| Autor: | Anja Konzept, Andre Kaufmann, Benedikt Reick, Danilo Engelmann, Ralf Stetter |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
Battery (electricity)
Refrigerator car Drivetrain TL1-4050 Sense (electronics) Energy consumption power-loss CO2-emissions Automotive engineering Power (physics) charging Range (aeronautics) TJ1-1570 Environmental science e-mobility Mechanical engineering and machinery TJ227-240 Machine design and drawing Energy (signal processing) Motor vehicles. Aeronautics. Astronautics |
| Zdroj: | Vehicles Volume 3 Issue 4 Pages 43-748 Vehicles, Vol 3, Iss 43, Pp 736-748 (2021) |
| ISSN: | 2624-8921 |
| DOI: | 10.3390/vehicles3040043 |
| Popis: | Due to increasing sales figures, the energy consumption of battery-electric vehicles is moving further into focus. In addition to efficient driving, it is also important that the energy losses during AC charging are as low as possible for a sustainable operation. In many situations it is not possible or necessary to charge the vehicle with the maximum charging power e.g., in apartment buildings. The influence of the charging mode (number of phases used, in-cable-control-box or used wallbox, charging current) on the charging efficiency is often unknown. In this work, the energy consumption of two electric vehicles in the Worldwide Harmonized Light-Duty Vehicles Test Cycle is presented. In-house developed measurement technology and vehicle CAN data are used. A detailed breakdown of charging losses, drivetrain efficiency, and overall energy consumption for one of the vehicles is provided. Finally, the results are discussed with reference to avoidable CO2 emissions. The charging losses of the tested vehicles range from 12.79 to 20.42%. Maximum charging power with three phases and 16 A charging current delivers the best efficiencies. Single-phase charging was considered down to 10 A, where the losses are greatest. The drivetrain efficiency while driving is 63.88% on average for the WLTC, 77.12% in the “extra high” section and 23.12% in the “low” section. The resulting energy consumption for both vehicles is higher than the OEM data given (21.6 to 44.9%). Possible origins for the surplus on energy consumption are detailed. Over 100,000 km, unfavorable charging results in additional CO2 emissions of 1.24 t. The emissions for an assumed annual mileage of 20,000 km are three times larger than for a class A+ refrigerator. A classification of charging modes and chargers thus appears to make sense. In the following work, efficiency improvements in the charger as well as DC charging will be proposed. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|