In Rwandese Women with Low Iron Status, Iron Absorption from Low-Phytic Acid Beans and Biofortified Beans Is Comparable, but Low-Phytic Acid Beans Cause Adverse Gastrointestinal Symptoms

Autor: Bruno Campion, Christian Zwahlen, Fabian Rohner, Nicolai Petry, Pierrot L. Tugirimana, Diego Moretti, Michael Zimmerman, James P. Wirth, Jean Bosco Gahutu, Erick Boy
Rok vydání: 2016
Předmět:
Adult
0106 biological sciences
0301 basic medicine
congenital
hereditary
and neonatal diseases and abnormalities

Adolescent
Phytic Acid
Gastrointestinal Diseases
Iron
Population
Biofortification
Biological Availability
Medicine (miscellaneous)
Direct reduced iron
01 natural sciences
Intestinal absorption
Young Adult
03 medical and health sciences
chemistry.chemical_compound
Species Specificity
Humans
Food science
education
Phaseolus
Phytic acid
Meal
education.field_of_study
030109 nutrition & dietetics
Nutrition and Dietetics
Anemia
Iron-Deficiency

biology
Rwanda
food and beverages
Iron Deficiencies
biology.organism_classification
Diet
Bioavailability
Intestinal Absorption
chemistry
Biochemistry
Food
Fortified

Seeds
Digestion
Female
lipids (amino acids
peptides
and proteins)

Iron
Dietary

010606 plant biology & botany
Zdroj: The Journal of Nutrition. 146:970-975
ISSN: 0022-3166
Popis: BACKGROUND Phytic acid (PA) is a major inhibitor of iron bioavailability from beans, and high PA concentrations might limit the positive effect of biofortified beans (BBs) on iron status. Low-phytic acid (lpa) bean varieties could increase iron bioavailability. OBJECTIVE We set out to test whether lpa beans provide more bioavailable iron than a BB variety when served as part of a composite meal in a bean-consuming population with low iron status. METHODS Dietary iron absorption from lpa, iron-biofortified, and control beans (CBs) (regular iron and PA concentrations) was compared in 25 nonpregnant young women with low iron status with the use of a multiple-meal crossover design. Iron absorption was measured with stable iron isotopes. RESULTS PA concentration in lpa beans was ∼10% of BBs and CBs, and iron concentration in BBs was ∼2- and 1.5-fold compared with CBs and lpa beans, respectively. Fractional iron absorption from lpa beans [8.6% (95% CI: 4.8%, 15.5%)], BBs [7.3% (95% CI: 4.0%, 13.4%)], and CBs [8.0% (95% CI: 4.4%, 14.6%)] did not significantly differ. The total amount of iron absorbed from lpa beans and BBs was 421 μg (95% CI: 234, 756 μg) and 431 μg (95% CI: 237, 786 μg), respectively, and did not significantly differ, but was >50% higher (P < 0.005) than from CBs (278 μg; 95% CI: 150, 499 μg). In our trial, the lpa beans were hard to cook, and their consumption caused transient adverse digestive side effects in ∼95% of participants. Gel electrophoresis analysis showed phytohemagglutinin L (PHA-L) residues in cooked lpa beans. CONCLUSION BBs and lpa beans provided more bioavailable iron than control beans and could reduce dietary iron deficiency. Digestive side effects of lpa beans were likely caused by PHA-L, but it is unclear to what extent the associated digestive problems reduced iron bioavailability. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02215278.
Databáze: OpenAIRE