Development and application of a rubric to compare strategies for improving access to health care in rural communities in the United States
| Autor: | Kristin A. Schuller, Cory E. Cronin, Shannon E. Nicks, Michele Morrone, Xia Jing, Caroline Kingori |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2019 |
| Předmět: |
Social Psychology
Strategy and Management Decision Making Geography Planning and Development Medically Underserved Area Environment Health Services Accessibility Health care Humans Sociology Program Development Business and International Management Workgroup Medical education business.industry Data Collection Rural health Public Health Environmental and Occupational Health Rubric United States Socioeconomic Factors Community health Rural Health Services Metric (unit) Rural area business PDCA Program Evaluation |
| Zdroj: | Evaluation and Program Planning. 74:61-68 |
| ISSN: | 0149-7189 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2019.02.013 |
| Popis: | Rural areas are underserved in terms of the availability of and access to health care services. According to Healthy People 2020, access to health care continues to be the most frequently identified rural health priority in the United States. Purpose The purpose was to develop an efficient approach for standardizing and prioritizing strategies to improve access to health care in rural areas across the United States. The rubric provides a quantitative metric of the effectiveness of each strategy in terms of impact and feasibility and allows community health departments and other access to care groups to compare strategies and facilitate discussion of various strategies’ ability to meet the needs of diverse communities. Framework The Plan, Do, Check, Act (PDCA) cycle was used to create the rubric. The research team constructed a plan for creating a rubric to measure each strategy’s impact and feasibility. We checked the rubric by applying it to selected access to care improvement strategies evaluated by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF). Members of a rural community Access to Care Workgroup applied the rubric to several RWJF What Works for Health strategies. The final step was to compare the results of the application phase through facilitated conversations with the goal of determining which strategy or strategies would best meet the needs of the rural community. Discussion A rubric is a valuable tool to facilitate assessment and discussion and for assisting community members in determining access to care priorities. After applying the rubric in a community setting, we identified two important tactics: 1) the rubric is best applied to strategies when they are summarized consistently and cohesively; and 2) it is important to involve community stakeholders early in the process of identifying strategies for evaluation. The next step is to apply the rubric to similar strategies in other rural communities to further validate the rubric’s effectiveness. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full Text from ScienceDirect