Off-Pump or On-Pump Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting at 30 Days

Autor: André, Lamy, P J, Devereaux, Dorairaj, Prabhakaran, David P, Taggart, Shengshou, Hu, Ernesto, Paolasso, Zbynek, Straka, Leopoldo S, Piegas, Ahmet Ruchan, Akar, Anil R, Jain, Nicolas, Noiseux, Chandrasekar, Padmanabhan, Juan-Carlos, Bahamondes, Richard J, Novick, Prashant, Vaijyanath, Sukesh, Reddy, Liang, Tao, Pablo A, Olavegogeascoechea, Balram, Airan, Toomas-Andres, Sulling, Richard P, Whitlock, Yongning, Ou, Jennifer, Ng, Susan, Chrolavicius, Salim, Yusuf, R L, Tourville
Rok vydání: 2012
Předmět:
Zdroj: New England Journal of Medicine. 366:1489-1497
ISSN: 1533-4406
0028-4793
DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa1200388
Popis: BACKGROUND: The relative benefits and risks of performing coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) with a beating-heart technique (off-pump CABG), as compared with cardiopulmonary bypass (on-pump CABG), are not clearly established. METHODS: At 79 centers in 19 countries, we randomly assigned 4752 patients in whom CABG was planned to undergo the procedure off-pump or on-pump. The first coprimary outcome was a composite of death, nonfatal stroke, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or new renal failure requiring dialysis at 30 days after randomization. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the rate of the primary composite outcome between off-pump and on-pump CABG (9.8% vs. 10.3%; hazard ratio for the off-pump group, 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79 to 1.14; P=0.59) or in any of its individual components. The use of off-pump CABG, as compared with on-pump CABG, significantly reduced the rates of blood-product transfusion (50.7% vs. 63.3%; relative risk, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.75 to 0.85; P
Databáze: OpenAIRE