Crossing the Death Valley of publication process in cornea and ocular surface diseases: from abstracts presented at the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology annual meeting to full-text manuscripts
| Autor: | Emilio C. Campos, Adriana Ferreira de Araujo Litvin, Marco Pellegrini, Matilde Roda, Leonardo Taroni, Federico Bernabei, Giuseppe Giannaccare, Stefano Sebastiani, Fabiana Moscardelli |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Multivariate analysis Publications/statistical Abstracting and indexing as topic Bibliometria Bibliometrics Congresses as topic Congressos como assunto Cornea Córnea dados numéricos Meeting abstract numerical data Publicações/es-tatística Resumo de reunião Resumos e indexação como assunto Scopus Publications/statistical & numerical data NO Ophthalmology medicine Association (psychology) Publication process Impact factor business.industry General Medicine RE1-994 Publicações/estatística & dados numéricos Time course business Ocular surface |
| Zdroj: | Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia, Volume: 84, Issue: 2, Pages: 121-127, Published: 03 FEB 2021 Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia, Vol 84, Iss 2, Pp 121-127 (2021) Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia v.84 n.2 2021 Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia (CBO) instacron:CBO |
| ISSN: | 0004-2749 |
| Popis: | Purpose: This study was conducted to analyze the profile and publication rate of abstracts in indexed journals presented in the cornea section at the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Annual Meeting and to further identify potential predictive factors for better outcomes. Methods: Abstracts accepted for presentation at the 2013 Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Annual Meeting in the cornea section were sought via PubMed and Scopus to identify whether they had been published as full-text manuscripts. First author’s name, time of publication, journal’s name, and impact factor were recorded. A multivariate regression was performed to explore the association between variables and both the likelihood of publication and the journal’s impact factor. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to evaluate the time course of publication of abstracts. Results: Of the 939 analyzed abstracts, 360 (38.3%) were published in journals with a median impact factor of 3.4. The median time interval between abstract submission and article publication was 22 months. The multivariate analysis revealed that abstracts were more likely to be published if they were funded (OR=1.482, p=0.005), had a control group (OR=1.511, p=0.016), and had a basic science research scope (OR=1.388, p=0.020). The journal’s impact factor was higher in funded studies (β=0.163, p=0.002) but lower in multicenter studies (β=-0.170, p=0.001). The Kaplan-Meier analyses revealed significant differences in the publication time distribution for basic science vs clinical abstracts (χ2=7.636), controlled vs uncontrolled studies (χ2=6.921), and funded vs unfunded research (χ2=13.892) (p |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|