Robotic or laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus open sacrohysteropexy for uterus preservation in pelvic organ prolapse
| Autor: | Maria Lee, Jiheum Paek, Yongil Kwon, Bo Wook Kim |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2015 |
| Předmět: |
Reoperation
medicine.medical_specialty Urology Operative Time Blood Loss Surgical Uterus Pelvic Organ Prolapse law.invention Hemoglobins 03 medical and health sciences Gynecologic Surgical Procedures Postoperative Complications 0302 clinical medicine Robotic Surgical Procedures Randomized controlled trial Blood loss law Operating time medicine Humans In patient 030212 general & internal medicine Aged Retrospective Studies Pelvic organ 030219 obstetrics & reproductive medicine business.industry Medical record Obstetrics and Gynecology Middle Aged Sacrohysteropexy Surgery medicine.anatomical_structure Patient Satisfaction Female Laparoscopy business Organ Sparing Treatments |
| Zdroj: | International Urogynecology Journal. 27:593-599 |
| ISSN: | 1433-3023 0937-3462 |
| Popis: | The aim of this study was to compare robotic or laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy (RLSH) and open sacrohysteropexy (OSH) as a surgical treatment for pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Among 111 consecutive patients who had undergone sacrohysteropexy for POP, surgical outcomes and postoperative symptoms were compared between the RLSH (n = 54; robotic 14 cases and laparoscopic 40 cases) and OSH (n = 57). groups The medical records of enrolled patients were reviewed retrospectively. Compared with the OSH group, the RLSH group had shorter operating time (120.2 vs 187.5 min, p |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full text from SpringerLink