Biased interpretations of ambiguous bodily threat information in adolescents with chronic pain

Autor: Lauren C. Heathcote, Elaine Fox, Christopher Eccleston, Jennifer Y. F. Lau, Konrad Jacobs
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2018
Předmět:
Male
CHRONIC
CHILDREN
Chronic pain
ATTENTIONAL BIAS
Attentional bias
Adolescents
Disability Evaluation
0302 clinical medicine
030212 general & internal medicine
Child
MUSCULOSKELETAL PAIN
Pain Measurement
Ambiguous situations
Catastrophization
Cognition
REVISED CHILD ANXIETY
Cognitive bias
Neurology
Female
Pain catastrophizing
Chronic Pain
Psychology
medicine.medical_specialty
Adolescent
Sensation
SELECTIVE ATTENTION
03 medical and health sciences
Bias
medicine
Humans
Disabled Persons
NEGATIVE INTERPRETATION BIAS
RECURRENT ABDOMINAL-PAIN
Psychiatry
Retrospective Studies
Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
Analysis of Variance
Adult patients
Mood Disorders
Interpretation (philosophy)
Retrospective cohort study
Interpretation bias
medicine.disease
DEPRESSION SCALE
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
EXPERIENCE
Neurology (clinical)
ANXIOUS
SOCIAL REORIENTATION
030217 neurology & neurosurgery
Zdroj: Heathcote, L C, Jacobs, K, Eccleston, C, Fox, E & Lau, J Y F 2017, ' Biased interpretations of ambiguous bodily threat information in adolescents with chronic pain ', Pain, vol. 158, no. 3, pp. 471-478 . https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000781
PAIN
ISSN: 0304-3959
1872-6623
DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000781
Popis: Adult patients with chronic pain are consistently shown to interpret ambiguous health and bodily information in a pain-related and threatening way. This interpretation bias may play a role in the development and maintenance of pain and disability. However, no studies have yet investigated the role of interpretation bias in adolescent patients with pain, despite that pain often first becomes chronic in youth. We administered the Adolescent Interpretations of Bodily Threat (AIBT) task to adolescents with chronic pain (N 5 66) and adolescents without chronic pain (N574). Adolescents were 10 to 18 years old and completed the study procedures either at the clinic (patient group) or at school (control group). We found that adolescents with chronic pain were less likely to endorse benign interpretations of ambiguous pain and bodily threat information than adolescents without chronic pain, particularly when reporting on the strength of belief in those interpretations being true. These differences between patients and controls were not evident for ambiguous social situations, and they could not be explained by differences in anxious or depressive symptoms. Furthermore, this interpretation pattern was associated with increased levels of disability among adolescent patients, even after controlling for severity of chronic pain and pain catastrophizing. The current findings extend our understanding of the role and nature of cognition in adolescent pain, and provide justification for using the AIBT task in longitudinal and training studies to further investigate causal associations between interpretation bias and chronic pain.
Databáze: OpenAIRE