Hydrosonographic Assessment of the Effect of Two Different Suture Materials on Healing of the Uterine Scar after Cesarean Delivery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

Autor: Osman Sevket, Taha Takmaz, Sevde Havva Islek, Belfin Nur Arici Halici, Pinar Ozcan
Přispěvatelé: ŞEVKET, OSMAN
Rok vydání: 2020
Předmět:
Adult
medicine.medical_specialty
Adolescent
A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.-
Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie
2020 [Sevket O.
Takmaz T.
Ozcan P.
Halici B.
Islek S.
-Hydrosonographic Assessment of the Effect of Two Different Suture Materials on Healing of the Uterine Scar after Cesarean Delivery]

law.invention
Cicatrix
Young Adult
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Suture (anatomy)
Randomized controlled trial
Pregnancy
law
Maternity and Midwifery
medicine
Humans
Prospective Studies
030212 general & internal medicine
Cesarean delivery
Prospective cohort study
030219 obstetrics & reproductive medicine
Sutures
Cesarean Section
business.industry
Suture Techniques
Myometrium
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Surgery
Incision Site
Pediatrics
Perinatology and Child Health

Female
Preoperative hemoglobin
Absorbable sutures
business
Zdroj: Zeitschrift für Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie. 225:140-145
ISSN: 1439-1651
0948-2393
Popis: This study aimed to compare the effects of two different suture materials, monofilament synthetic absorbable sutures versus multifilament synthetic absorbable sutures, on healing the uterine scar after a cesarean delivery.A total of 95 women between the ages of 18 and 40 who had undergone a primary cesarean section (CS) after the 38No statistically significant differences were observed between the groups with regard to the preoperative hemoglobin concentrations, the change in the hemoglobin concentrations, operating time, and the number of intraoperative additional hemostatic uterine sutures. Mean thickness of the residual myometrium covering the defect was thicker in the monofilament suture group in comparison to the multifilament suture group (7.76±2.11 vs. 5.96±1.69, respectively; p0.01). The mean healing ratio was significantly higher in the monofilament suture group in comparison to the multifilament suture group (0.76±0.13 vs. 0.60±0.12, respectively; p0.01) CONCLUSION: Continuous double-layer unlocked closure of the uterine incision at cesarean delivery using monofilament synthetic absorbable sutures decreases the risk of CS scar defect.This study aimed to compare the effects of two different suture materials, monofilament synthetic absorbable sutures versus multifilament synthetic absorbable sutures, on healing the uterine scar after a cesarean delivery.A total of 95 women between the ages of 18 and 40 who had undergone a primary cesarean section (CS) after the 38No statistically significant differences were observed between the groups with regard to the preoperative hemoglobin concentrations, the change in the hemoglobin concentrations, operating time, and the number of intraoperative additional hemostatic uterine sutures. Mean thickness of the residual myometrium covering the defect was thicker in the monofilament suture group in comparison to the multifilament suture group (7.76±2.11 vs. 5.96±1.69, respectively; p0.01). The mean healing ratio was significantly higher in the monofilament suture group in comparison to the multifilament suture group (0.76±0.13 vs. 0.60±0.12, respectively; p0.01) CONCLUSION: Continuous double-layer unlocked closure of the uterine incision at cesarean delivery using monofilament synthetic absorbable sutures decreases the risk of CS scar defect.
Databáze: OpenAIRE