Pitfalls in quantifying exploration in reward-based motor learning and how to avoid them
| Autor: | Nina M. van Mastrigt, Katinka van der Kooij, Jeroen B. J. Smeets |
|---|---|
| Přispěvatelé: | Sensorimotor Control, AMS - Rehabilitation & Development, IBBA, AMS - Sports |
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
General Computer Science
Computer science business.industry Motor learning Movement Machine learning computer.software_genre Outcome (game theory) Task (project management) Reinforcement Variable (computer science) Trial-by-trial analysis Reward Motor noise Learning Original Article Artificial intelligence Exploration Variability business computer Selection (genetic algorithm) Biotechnology |
| Zdroj: | van Mastrigt, N M, van der Kooij, K & Smeets, J B J 2021, ' Pitfalls in quantifying exploration in reward-based motor learning and how to avoid them ', Biological Cybernetics, vol. 115, no. 4, pp. 365-382 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-021-00884-8 Biological Cybernetics Biological Cybernetics, 115(4), 365-382. Springer Verlag |
| ISSN: | 0340-1200 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s00422-021-00884-8 |
| Popis: | When learning a movement based on binary success information, one is more variable following failure than following success. Theoretically, the additional variability post-failure might reflect exploration of possibilities to obtain success. When average behavior is changing (as in learning), variability can be estimated from differences between subsequent movements. Can one estimate exploration reliably from such trial-to-trial changes when studying reward-based motor learning? To answer this question, we tried to reconstruct the exploration underlying learning as described by four existing reward-based motor learning models. We simulated learning for various learner and task characteristics. If we simply determined the additional change post-failure, estimates of exploration were sensitive to learner and task characteristics. We identified two pitfalls in quantifying exploration based on trial-to-trial changes. Firstly, performance-dependent feedback can cause correlated samples of motor noise and exploration on successful trials, which biases exploration estimates. Secondly, the trial relative to which trial-to-trial change is calculated may also contain exploration, which causes underestimation. As a solution, we developed the additional trial-to-trial change (ATTC) method. By moving the reference trial one trial back and subtracting trial-to-trial changes following specific sequences of trial outcomes, exploration can be estimated reliably for the three models that explore based on the outcome of only the previous trial. Since ATTC estimates are based on a selection of trial sequences, this method requires many trials. In conclusion, if exploration is a binary function of previous trial outcome, the ATTC method allows for a model-free quantification of exploration. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00422-021-00884-8. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full text from SpringerLink