Advanced oxidative processes and membrane separation for micropollutant removal from biotreated domestic wastewater
Autor: | Juacyara Carbonelli Campos, Larissa L. S. Silva, Fabiana Valéria da Fonseca, Julio Cesar Soares Sales, Daniele Maia Bila |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2016 |
Předmět: |
Ultraviolet Rays
Health Toxicology and Mutagenesis 0208 environmental biotechnology Sewage 02 engineering and technology Oxidative phosphorylation 010501 environmental sciences 01 natural sciences Water Purification Membrane technology Estradiol Congeners Environmental Chemistry Ecotoxicology Reverse osmosis 0105 earth and related environmental sciences Chromatography business.industry Chemistry Membranes Artificial Hydrogen Peroxide General Medicine Pulp and paper industry Pollution 020801 environmental engineering Membrane Wastewater business Oxidation-Reduction Water Pollutants Chemical |
Zdroj: | Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 24:6329-6338 |
ISSN: | 1614-7499 0944-1344 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11356-016-7312-y |
Popis: | The presence of micropollutants in sewage is already widely known, as well as the effects caused by natural and synthetic hormones. Thus, it is necessary to apply treatments to remove them from water systems, such as advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) and membrane separation processes, which can oxidize and remove high concentrations of organic compounds. This work investigated the removal of 17β-estradiol (E2), 17α-ethinylestradiol (EE2), and estriol (E3) from biotreated sewage. Reverse osmosis processes were conducted at three recoveries (50, 60, and 70 %). For E2 and EE2, the removals were affected by the recovery. The best results for RO were as follows: the E2 compound removal was 89 % for 60 % recovery and the EE2 compound removal was 57 % for 50 % recovery. The RO recovery did not impact the E3 removal. It was concluded that the interaction between the evaluated estrogens, and the membrane was the major factor for the hormone separation. The AOP treatment using H2O2/UV was carried out in two sampling campaigns. First, we evaluated the variation of UV doses (24.48, 73.44, 122.4, and 244.8 kJ m−2) with 18.8 mg L−1 of H2O2 in the reaction. EE2 showed considerable removals (around 70 %). In order to optimize the results, an experimental design was applied. The best result was obtained with higher UV dose (122.4 kJ m−2) and lower H2O2 concentration (4 mg L−1), achieving removal of 91 % for E3 and 100 % for E2 and EE2. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |